Mead Property Investments Pty Ltd v P & M Galea Pty Ltd

Mead Property Investments Pty Ltd, the plaintiff, sought to enforce certain agreements against P & M Galea Pty Ltd, the defendant, and the proceedings were heard in the Supreme Court of Victoria. The plaintiff argued that it was entitled to enforce a deed executed by the defendant, as well as an oral contract, an implied contract, or a contract by agency. The plaintiff also claimed restitution for unjust enrichment and quantum meruit. The defendant denied the plaintiff's claims, and the court was required to determine whether the plaintiff had standing to enforce the deed and whether the other claims were valid.

The court found that the plaintiff did not have standing to enforce the deed as it was not a party to the agreement. The court further found that there was no evidence of an oral or implied contract or a contract by agency between the parties. The court also found that the plaintiff's claim for restitution was not supported by the evidence. The court held that the plaintiff's claims were without merit and dismissed the proceedings.

The court held that the defendant was entitled to judgment in its favour and that the cross-claim brought by the defendant against a third party was also dismissed. The court found that the defendant had established its case and was entitled to judgment in its favour. The court ordered that judgment be entered for the defendant, the proceedings be dismissed, and judgment be entered for the cross-defendant. The First Cross-Claim was also dismissed. The plaintiff's claims were rejected in their entirety, and the defendant was awarded costs.