McRobert Superannuation Pty Ltd & Ors v Cranston
[2021] HCASL 227
MCROBERT SUPERANNUATION PTY LTD & ORS
v
CRANSTON & ORS
[2021] HCASL 227
P38/2021
The concurrent findings of fact by the primary judge and the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Western Australia were based on a preference for the evidence of the respondents' witnesses over that of the principal witness for the applicants. There is no sufficient prospect that these findings of fact would be overturned to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. That being so, the proposed appeal is not a suitable vehicle for the agitation of any question of principle of general importance. The application for special leave should be refused.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application with costs.
P.A. Keane J.S. Gleeson 11 November 2021
0
0