McQUADE V POLICE
[1999] SASC 277
Magistrate’s Appeals
MARTIN J. (Ex tempore) The appellant, who is 27 years of age and was unrepresented, pleaded guilty to charges of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, common assault and damaging household furniture. In respect of the offence of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, which was committed on 30 June 1998, the magistrate imposed a penalty of 100 hours community service, to be performed within twelve months. Fees and costs totalling $132 were also imposed. On the other two charges, which were committed on 19 July 1998, his Honour imposed one penalty pursuant to s 18A of the Criminal Law (Sentencing) Act 1988, that the defendant perform 100 hours of community service within six months. Fees and costs totalling $174 were also imposed.
The sentence was imposed on 12 April 1998. The notice of appeal was filed on 24 May 1999. The Crown did not oppose an extension of time within which to appeal and time was extended accordingly.
In essence the ground of appeal against sentence complains that the magistrate erred in having insufficient regard to the appellant's drug use and psychological functioning, and that he erred in requiring community service, while not ordering that the appellant be subject to some form of supervision with counselling and treatment. In addition, it is said that there was an error in the sentencing process because the magistrate failed to advise the appellant of his right to apply to the magistrate for the exercise of the discretion not to record a conviction.
All offences arose in the context of a difficult and strained family situation. Over a period of time, the relationship between the appellant and his parents had deteriorated. The appellant was experiencing considerable difficulty in controlling his anger.
On 30 June 1998, the appellant had a disagreement with his brother which became physical. In a fit of anger he began to damage a vehicle with the handle of a hydraulic jack and swung the handle at his brother who put up his left arm to protect himself. The handle struck the victim's wrist and chipped a bone. That action is the basis of the offence of the assault occasioning actual bodily harm.
On 19 July 1998, at the family home, an argument developed between the appellant and his father. The appellant left the home, but entered a cottage on the property and damaged an old washing machine in the cottage. There were further words between the appellant and his father at the cottage. Later the appellant returned to the home in an angry state of mind and damaged more property. He also picked up a broom handle and struck his father on the leg with the handle. A later inspection of the cottage disclosed further damage to the cottage and property within it. The total damage was approximately $730.
After the appellant had pleaded guilty and had been remanded while a pre-sentence report was obtained, the appellant's father wrote to the magistrate and to…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read McQuade v Police and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [1999] SASC 277
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: MARTIN J
Full text does not contain this section.