NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: MCQ [2014] NSWCATGD 29 Hearing dates: 13 August 2014 Decision date: 13 August 2014 Jurisdiction: Guardianship Division Before: Simpson J, Senior Member (Legal)
Creasey H, Senior Member (Professional)
Porter L, General Member (Community)Decision: Guardianship application dismissed.
Financial management order made; private manager appointed.
Enduring power of attorney reviewed; no orders made; application dismissed.
Catchwords: GUARDIANSHIP - application for guardianship order - standing - genuine concern - person responsible - enduring guardianship appointment made - family conflict - allegations that enduring guardian restricting communication and access to family - subject person's views - no need for an order.
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT - application for financial management order - standing - conflict of interest - capability to manage - complexity of estate - family businesses - suitability for appointment - no fees or remuneration proposed to be charged by professional accountant.
ENDURING POWER OF ATTORNEY - application to review operation and effect - gifts made to attorney - attorney entitled to benefits under the power - conflict of interest.Legislation Cited: Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW)
Powers of Attorney Act 2003 (NSW)Cases Cited: ACJ [2007] NSWGT 15
QAG [2007] NSWGT 12
KTC [2011] NSWGT 21
IF v IG & Others [2004] NSWADTAP 3
PY v RJS [1992] 2 NSWLR 700
H v H, unreported, Supreme Court of NSW, Justice Young, 20 March 2000
Re GHI [2005] NSWSC 581
P v R [2003] NSWSC 819
Re D [2012] NSWSC 1006
Re R [2000] NSWSC 886
Holt v Protective Commissioner [1993] 31 NSWLR 227
SH v Protective Commissioner [2006] ADTAP 22
LA v Protective Commissioner [2004] NSWADTAP 39
M v M [2013] NSWSC 1495
H v H, Supreme Court Protective Division, unreported, Hodgson J, 31 March 1994
Re L [2000] NSWSC 721Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr MCQ (subject person)
Mrs MSQ (spouse, attorney and enduring guardian)
Mr PMN (applicant)
The Public Guardian
The NSW Trustee and GuardianFile Number(s): 55165 Publication restriction: Decisions of the Guardianship Division of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal have been anonymised to remove any information that may identify any person involved in the Tribunal's proceedings (s 65, Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)).
reasons for decision
WHAT THE TRIBUNAL DECIDED
The Tribunal dismissed the application for a guardianship order. The Tribunal appointed Mr SXA as financial manager for Mr MCQ subject to the oversight and direction of the NSW Trustee and Guardian. The Tribunal decided to make no order following its review of the enduring power of attorney.
BACKGROUND
Mr MCQ is an 80-year old man with cognitive and physical disabilities and a range of health conditions. He lives at an aged care facility on the North Shore of Sydney. Mr MCQ has three adult children from his first marriage, Mr PMN, Mr NUH and Ms DVB. For 34 years he has been married to his second wife Mrs MSQ. He has two stepchildren, Mr LKJ and Ms TWD.
In 2002, Mr MCQ signed an enduring…
Continue reading MCQ
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- MCQ [2014] NSWCATGD 29
- Case
- [2014] NSWCATGD 29
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues included the applicant's standing to apply for a guardianship order, whether there was a genuine concern for the subject person's welfare, and the appropriateness of the enduring guardian's actions. Regarding the financial management order, the court had to assess the standing of the applicant, the conflict of interest, the subject person's capability to manage their own affairs, and the suitability of the proposed private manager. The review of the enduring power of attorney involved examining the gifts made to the attorney, the attorney's entitlement to benefits under the power, and the presence of a conflict of interest.
The court found that there was no need for a guardianship order as the enduring guardian was fulfilling their responsibilities adequately, and the subject person's views and interests were being considered. For the financial management order, the court appointed a private manager, a professional accountant, who proposed to act without fees or remuneration, thereby mitigating concerns about conflict of interest. The court decided not to make any orders regarding the review of the enduring power of attorney as there was no evidence of abuse of power or conflict of interest. The application to review was dismissed.
The court dismissed the guardianship application, made a financial management order appointing a private manager, and dismissed the application to review the enduring power of attorney.
Orders
Orders of the court
Guardianship application dismissed.
Financial management order made; private manager appointed.
Enduring power of attorney reviewed; no orders made; application dismissed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.