McMillan and McMillan
Case
•
[2019] FamCA 928
•5 December 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
McMillan and McMillan [2019] FamCA 928
[2019] FamCA 928
5 December 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant, McMillan, sought orders against the respondent, also McMillan, in a proceeding before Tree J. The nature of the dispute is not detailed in the provided text, but it concerned an Application in a Case filed by the applicant on 3 September 2019.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the applicant's Application in a Case filed on 3 September 2019 should be granted. The court was required to determine the merits of this application and make a determination regarding the costs associated with the proceedings.
Tree J dismissed the applicant's Application in a Case filed on 3 September 2019. Consequently, the court ordered that the applicant pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to that application, to be assessed on a party/party basis.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the applicant's Application in a Case filed on 3 September 2019 should be granted. The court was required to determine the merits of this application and make a determination regarding the costs associated with the proceedings.
Tree J dismissed the applicant's Application in a Case filed on 3 September 2019. Consequently, the court ordered that the applicant pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to that application, to be assessed on a party/party basis.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Standing
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
McMillan and McMillan [2019] FamCA 928
Most Recent Citation
ADSM Logistics Group Australia Pty Ltd v Zhang [2022] VCC 877
Cases Citing This Decision
8
Walker v Veda Advantage Information Services
[2011] QSC 316
AB v The King
[2023] NSWCCA 165
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
0
McMillan & McMillan
[2016] FamCA 387
McMillan and McMillan (No 2)
[2016] FamCA 894
Johnson v Johnson
[2000] HCA 48