McLeod v The Queen
Case
•
[2018] ACTCA 59
•4 December 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
McLeod v The Queen [2018] ACTCA 59
[2018] ACTCA 59
4 December 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an appeal against sentence brought by the appellant, McLeod, against the respondent, The Queen. The appeal was heard by Elkaim, Mossop JJ and Robinson AJ.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the primary judge had erred in treating the appellant's failure to repay stolen money as an aggravating factor when assessing the objective seriousness of the offence.
The Court reasoned that the failure to repay stolen property is a relevant consideration in assessing the objective seriousness of an offence, particularly where the offender has had the opportunity to make restitution. This is because such a failure can indicate a lack of remorse or a continued disregard for the victim's loss. The Court found no error in the primary judge's approach and upheld the sentence imposed.
The appeal was dismissed.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the primary judge had erred in treating the appellant's failure to repay stolen money as an aggravating factor when assessing the objective seriousness of the offence.
The Court reasoned that the failure to repay stolen property is a relevant consideration in assessing the objective seriousness of an offence, particularly where the offender has had the opportunity to make restitution. This is because such a failure can indicate a lack of remorse or a continued disregard for the victim's loss. The Court found no error in the primary judge's approach and upheld the sentence imposed.
The appeal was dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
-
Evidence
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Sentencing
-
Charge
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
McLeod v The Queen [2018] ACTCA 59
Most Recent Citation
Lewis v Storey [2019] ACTSC 74
Cases Citing This Decision
26
Forster-Jones v The Queen
[2020] ACTCA 31
Director of Public Prosecutions v White
[2025] ACTSC 156
Director of Public Prosecutions v Hicks
[2025] ACTSC 15
Cases Cited
10
Statutory Material Cited
2
Kentwell v The Queen
[2014] HCA 37
Muldrock v The Queen
[2011] HCA 39
Thewlis v R
[2008] NSWCCA 176