FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| McKINNON & ANOR v PATTISON (No.2) | [2009] FMCA 696 |
| BANKRUPTCY – Whether time extended for notice of taxation. |
| Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss.33(1)(c), 64ZBA, 162, 167 Supreme Court Act 1986 (Vic) s.101 Penalty Interests Rate Act 1983 (Vic) s.2 Bankruptcy Regulations 1996 (Cth) r.8.09 |
| Aparatne v Tredula VG 7894 of 1998 (North J, unreported 18/12/1998) Vince v Sellars (2004) FMCA 564 |
| First Applicant: | JEANETTE BEVERLY McKINNON |
| Second Applicant: | DONALD NEIL McKINNON |
| Respondent: | PAUL ANTHONY PATTISON |
| File Number: | MLG 369 of 2009 |
| Judgment of: | Phipps FM |
| Hearing date: | 19 June 2009 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 19 June 2009 |
| Delivered at: | Melbourne |
| Delivered on: | 19 June 2009 |
REPRESENTATION
| The Applicants: | Appearing in person |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Mr M. Black |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | TurksLegal |
ORDERS
The application filed 6 April 2009 is dismissed.
The Applicant’s pay the Respondent’s costs of the Application to Review fixed at $5,000 and the costs of $4,710 ordered by Registrar Moore on 25 May 2009.
The operation of order 2 be stayed for 30 days.
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT MELBOURNE |
MLG 369 of 2009
| JEANETTE BEVERLY MCKINNON & DONALD NEIL McKINNON |
Applicants
And
| PAUL ANTHONY PATTISON |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The applicants Mr and Mrs McKinnon apply for an extension of time in which they can give notice to a taxing officer to have their trustee in bankruptcy costs and expenses taxed. The applicants were made bankrupt by sequestration order made on 26 August 2005. The respondent Mr Pattison is the trustee in bankruptcy.
In December of last year, Mr Pattison, pursuant to s.64ZBA of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) set in train the process by which the creditors of the estate might pass a resolution approving the trustees' remuneration without a meeting being held. Under s.162 of the Bankruptcy Act, the remuneration of the trustee may be fixed by resolution of creditors and s.64ZBA provides a process by which that resolution can be passed without the need for a meeting to be held.
There are two creditors, according to Mr Pattison. They are the Commonwealth Bank of Australia and the Australian Taxation Office. There is no doubt about the Commonwealth Bank of Australia as a creditor because it obtained a judgment in the Supreme Court of Victoria on 27 June 2001 for an amount of $222,985.29. By the time a bankruptcy notice was issued on the 10 October 2009, interest had accrued of $59, 009.06. That is interest calculated in accordance with s.101 Supreme Court Act 1986 (Vic) at the rate prescribed by s.2 Penalty Interests Rate Act 1983 (Vic).
The Australian Taxation Office is accepted by Mr Pattison at $20,951. Ms McKinnon, who speaks for both applicants, says that they dispute that amount, but the trustee has accepted it. He has received approval of the resolution approving his remuneration. He has received that approval from both Commonwealth Bank of Australia and the Australian Taxation Office. The amount is $137,000.
On 8 December Mr Pattison sent the applicants,…
Continue reading McKinnon v Pattison (No.2)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- McKinnon v Pattison (No.2) [2009] FMCA 696
- Case
- [2009] FMCA 696
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court's reasoning was based on the fact that the application filed by McKinnon did not meet the necessary requirements to be successful. The court found that McKinnon's application was not sufficient and did not warrant a favourable outcome. The court also took into consideration the costs that had been incurred by the Respondent due to the application, and deemed it necessary for McKinnon to pay these costs. The operation of order 2 was to be stayed for 30 days, giving McKinnon some time to arrange for the payment of the costs. Overall, the court's decision was based on the merits of the case and the legal requirements involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The application filed 6 April 2009 is dismissed.
2.
The Applicant’s pay the Respondent’s costs of the Application to Review fixed at $5,000 and the costs of $4,710 ordered by Registrar Moore on 25 May 2009.
3.
The operation of order 2 be stayed for 30 days.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.