McGettigan v Coulter

Case [2022] NSWCA 166


Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: McGettigan v Coulter [2022] NSWCA 166
Hearing dates: 24 June 2022
Date of orders: 29 August 2022
Decision date: 29 August 2022
Before: Meagher JA at [1];
Leeming JA at [78];
White JA at [79]
Decision:

(1) Refuse an extension of the time for the applicant to file his notice of appeal.

(2) Dismiss the appeal as incompetent.

(3) Dismiss the applicant’s motion filed 30 June 2022.

(4) Order that the applicant pay the respondents’ costs of the application to extend time and of the proposed appeal.

Catchwords:

SUCCESSION – probate and administration – where primary judge granted letters of administration to respondents in respect of deceased’s 2000 will – where applicant challenged validity of that will and propounded 2016 will – where primary judge found applicant had no standing to challenge 2000 will and rejected substance of his challenge – where primary judge found 2016 will fabricated by applicant – whether evidence sufficient to support primary judge’s conclusions

CIVIL PROCEDURE – application to adduce further evidence in the appeal – where evidence sought to be led could have been obtained with reasonable diligence for use at trial – where no realistic probability that with benefit of evidence there would be different outcome in the proceedings – no “special grounds” established under Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) s 75A(8) – application dismissed

Legislation Cited:

Succession Act 2006 (NSW), ss 107, 111

Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 75A(7), 75A(8), 75A(9)

Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 51.2, 51.6, 51.9, 51.16(2), 51.51

Cases Cited:

Akins v National Australia Bank (1994) 34 NSWLR 155

In re Devoy; Fitzgerald v Fitzgerald [1943] St R Qd 137

Housing Commission of New South Wales v Tatmar Pastoral Co Pty Ltd [1983] 3 NSWLR 378

Nobarani v Mariconte (2018) 265 CLR 236; [2018] HCA 36

Searle v Commonwealth of Australia (2019) 100 NSWLR 55; [2019] NSWCA 127

Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: John Patrick McGettigan (Applicant)
Glen Patrick Coulter (First Respondent)
Rhonda Anne Coulter (Second Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:

Applicant in person
J Brown with N Simone (Respondents)

Solicitors:

Field Lawyers (Respondents)
File Number(s): 2021/256597
Publication restriction: Nil
 Decision under appeal 
Court or tribunal:
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Jurisdiction:
Civil
Citation:

[2021] NSWSC 1097; [2021] NSWSC 1356

Date of Decision:
31 August 2021
Before:
Slattery J
File Number(s):
2018/238970; 2018/174649; 2020/104101

HEADNOTE

[This headnote is not to be read as part of the judgment]

Brian McGettigan died on 17 April 2018, and his wife Beverley on 16 July 2018. The respondents, as executors of Beverley’s will, commenced probate proceedings seeking a grant of letters of administration of Brian’s estate with his will made on 19 January 2000 annexed. By that will Brian left his whole estate to Beverley.

The applicant, Brian’s brother, opposed the grant of letters of administration, contending that Brian’s 2000 will was a fabrication. By a cross-claim he…

Continue reading McGettigan v Coulter

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
McGettigan v Coulter [2022] NSWCA 166
Case
[2022] NSWCA 166
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, McGettigan, appealed to the Court of Appeal of New South Wales against a decision of the primary judge who had granted letters of administration to the respondents in respect of the deceased's 2000 will. McGettigan challenged the validity of the 2000 will and sought to propound a later will dated 2016. The primary judge had found that McGettigan lacked standing to challenge the 2000 will and had rejected the substance of his challenge, further concluding that the 2016 will was fabricated by McGettigan.

The legal issues before the Court of Appeal included whether the evidence was sufficient to support the primary judge’s conclusions regarding McGettigan's standing and the fabrication of the 2016 will. Additionally, the court considered an application by McGettigan to adduce further evidence on appeal, which required determining whether the evidence could have been obtained with reasonable diligence for the trial and if there were "special grounds" to admit it under section 75A(8) of the *Supreme Court Act 1970* (NSW).

The Court of Appeal dismissed McGettigan's application to adduce further evidence, finding that it could have been obtained with reasonable diligence at trial and that there was no realistic probability of a different outcome. Consequently, the court found that no "special grounds" were established. The court then determined that the appeal itself was incompetent.

The Court of Appeal ordered that an extension of time for the applicant to file his notice of appeal be refused, and the appeal be dismissed as incompetent. The applicant's motion filed on 30 June 2022 was also dismissed, and the applicant was ordered to pay the respondents' costs of the application to extend time and of the proposed appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) Refuse an extension of the time for the applicant to file his notice of appeal.

(2) Dismiss the appeal as incompetent.

(3) Dismiss the applicant’s motion filed 30 June 2022.

(4) Order that the applicant pay the respondents’ costs of the application to extend time and of the proposed appeal.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.