McGEACHIE v Clark

Case [2005] WASC 177


McGEACHIE & ORS -v- CLARK & ORS [2005] WASC 177



SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIACitation No:[2005] WASC 177
Case No:CIV:1901/200519 JULY 2005
Coram:COMMISSIONER ODES QC11/08/05
14Judgment Part:1 of 1
Result: Application dismissed with costs to be taxed
B
PDF Version
Parties:CATHERINE JOY McGEACHIE
RICHARD MITFORD ROWELL
GRAHAM SYDNEY BENSTEAD
AURELIA MARIA MAZZOLENI
LEE FRANCES NASH
WESLEY IAN CHARLES NASH
JAN IRVINE
AMRIT KENDRICK
GARY KENDRICK
RICHARD CLARK
DENNIS BEERE
JURGEN WERNER PREUSS
GAVAN KELLY
SILVER FOX INVESTMENTS PTY LTD (ACN 081 888 048)
MIDWAY ASSET PTY LTD (ACN 097 037)
CHURCHLANDS HOLDINGS PTY LTD (ACN 098 551 645)
PETER ANDRE GRANT

Catchwords:

Urgent interlocutory injunctions
Orders to prevent resolutions being put at annual general meeting
Approach of court
Exception to general rule of non-intervention

Legislation:

Strata Titles Act 1985 (WA), s 19

Case References:

Carr Boyd Minerals Limited v Ashton Mining Limited and Ors (1989) 15 ACLR 599
Hopkins Professional Services Pty Ltd v Foyster Holdings Pty Ltd (2001) 39 ACSR 519
Paringa Mining & Exploration Co plc v North Flinders Mines Limited (1988) 52 SASR 22
Pettaras v Pettaras [2004] NSWSC 1212
Tang v Bongreen Pty Ltd (2003) 47 ACSR 400
Uniting Church of Australia Property Trust (NSW) v Macquarie Radio Network Pty Ltd (1997) 24 ACSR 721

Nil

JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
    IN CIVIL
CITATION : McGEACHIE & ORS -v- CLARK & ORS [2005] WASC 177 CORAM : COMMISSIONER ODES QC HEARD : 19 JULY 2005 DELIVERED : 11 AUGUST 2005 FILE NO/S : CIV 1901 of 2005 BETWEEN : CATHERINE JOY McGEACHIE
    RICHARD MITFORD ROWELL
    First Plaintiffs

    GRAHAM SYDNEY BENSTEAD
    AURELIA MARIA MAZZOLENI
    Second Plaintiffs

    LEE FRANCES NASH
    WESLEY IAN CHARLES NASH
    Third Plaintiffs

    JAN IRVINE
    Fourth Plaintiff

    AMRIT KENDRICK
    GARY KENDRICK
    Fifth Plaintiff

    AND

    RICHARD CLARK
    First Defendant

    DENNIS BEERE
    Second Defendant


(Page 2)
    JURGEN WERNER PREUSS
    Third Defendant

    GAVAN KELLY
    Fourth Defendant

    SILVER FOX INVESTMENTS PTY LTD (ACN 081 888 048)
    Fifth Defendant

    MIDWAY ASSET PTY LTD (ACN 097 037)
    Sixth Defendant

    CHURCHLANDS HOLDINGS PTY LTD (ACN 098 551 645)
    Seventh Defendant

    PETER ANDRE GRANT
    Eighth Defendant



Catchwords:

Urgent interlocutory injunctions - Orders to prevent resolutions being put at annual general meeting - Approach of court - Exception to general rule of non-intervention




Legislation:

Strata Titles Act 1985 (WA), s 19




Result:

Application dismissed with costs to be taxed



(Page 3)

Category: B

Representation:


Counsel:


    First Plaintiffs : Mr I A Morison
    Second Plaintiffs : Mr I A Morison
    Third Plaintiffs : Mr I A Morison
    Fourth Plaintiff : Mr I A Morison
    Fifth Plaintiff : Mr I A Morison
    First Defendant : Mr W S Martin QC
    Second Defendant : Mr W S Martin QC
    Third Defendant : Mr W S Martin QC
    Fourth Defendant : Mr W S Martin QC
    Fifth Defendant : Mr W S Martin QC
    Sixth Defendant : Mr W S Martin QC
    Seventh Defendant : Mr W S Martin QC

Continue reading McGEACHIE v Clark

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
McGEACHIE v Clark [2005] WASC 177
Case
[2005] WASC 177
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The plaintiffs, who are members of a strata company, sought an urgent ex parte interlocutory injunction to prevent the passage of certain motions at the annual general meeting. The primary concern of the plaintiffs was to avoid any alteration or termination of the Strata Plan, which consisted of 118 hectares of common property. The legal issues involved the general reluctance of courts to intervene in meetings of corporations or strata companies and the exceptional circumstances under which such intervention might be justified. The court considered the precedents set in cases such as Uniting Church of Australia Property Trust (NSW) v Macquarie Radio Network Pty Ltd, Hopkins Professional Services Pty Ltd v Foyster Holdings Pty Ltd, Paringa Mining & Exploration Co plc v North Flinders Mines Limited, and Carr Boyd Minerals Limited v Ashton Mining Limited and Ors. These cases emphasised the fundamental right of members to convene meetings and move resolutions, and the courts' reluctance to interfere unless there was clear evidence of serious misconduct or irreparable harm. In this case, the proposed resolutions at the annual general meeting did not relate to the alteration of the Strata Plan or the re-subdivision of lots, and therefore did not fall within the exceptional circumstances for court intervention. The court concluded that the plaintiffs had not established a serious question to be tried and that the balance of convenience did not favour disturbing the status quo. Consequently, the application for the interlocutory injunction was dismissed, and the plaintiffs were ordered to pay the costs of the application.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.