Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: McEvoy v Wagglens Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 330 Hearing dates: 14 December 2020 Date of orders: 14 December 2020 Decision date: 14 December 2020 Before: Basten JA Decision: Notice of motion filed 8 December 2020 dismissed with costs.
Catchwords: APPEAL – stay – application for stay of garnishee pending appeal – appeal from judgment in Division on appeal from Local Court – respondent seeking to enforce costs orders – garnishee order issued – whether application for leave had reasonable prospects of success – small amount relative to statutory threshold for appeal as of right – no statement of specific grounds – likelihood of success leading to reversal of costs orders – evidence of non-recoverability if payments obtained
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – subpoenas and notices to produce – application to issue for purposes of appeal – need to show arguable case for adducing further evidence on appeal
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – appeal – submissions – application for waiver of rule limiting length of summary of argument – straightforward factual case – no basis for lengthy submissions
Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A
Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Fentin McEvoy (Applicant)
Wagglens Pty Ltd (First Respondent)
Roderick Cloonan Marr (Second Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Applicant unrepresented
Ms K MacDonald (Solicitor) (Respondents)
Applicant unrepresented
KMD Law and Advisory (Respondents)
File Number(s): 2020/173957 Decision under appeal
- Court or tribunal:
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction:
- Common Law Division
- Citation:
- Date of Decision:
- 15 May 2020
- Before:
- Ierace J
- File Number(s):
- 2019/45874
Judgment
-
BASTEN JA: The applicant, Fentin McEvoy, brought proceedings in the Local Court seeking to recover an amount of $26,250 from the first respondent, Wagglens Pty Ltd. The amount was claimed as unpaid wages due under a 12 month contract of employment which ran from 25 May 2011 to 25 May 2012. The matter had a chequered history in the Local Court; the claim was finally dismissed on 23 October 2018. A reopening application was dismissed on 4 December 2018.
-
On 11 February 2019, the applicant filed a summons seeking leave to appeal in the Common Law Division. (The summons and a number of other documents are missing from the white folder.) Judgment was delivered in the Common Law Division on 15 May 2020, refusing leave to appeal.
-
A notice of intention to seek leave to appeal from that decision was filed 11 June 2020, although the summons suggests it was served on 18 June 2020, a few days out of time. More significantly, the summons seeking leave to appeal was not filed until 20 October 2020, that is about two months out of time. There has been an exchange of affidavits between the parties which have been e-filed out of hours, and even the night before the hearing, which seems to be becoming a practice. I have not read the affidavits, which, it appears, related primarily to explaining issues of timing of the filing of documents…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read McEvoy v Wagglens Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2020] NSWCA 330
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether McEvoy had an arguable case with reasonable prospects of success on appeal, a threshold requirement for obtaining a stay of the garnishee order. This involved considering whether the appeal itself had a reasonable prospect of success, particularly given the relatively small amount of the costs orders in relation to the statutory threshold for an appeal as of right, and the lack of specific grounds of appeal being articulated. A further issue related to an application to issue subpoenas and notices to produce for the purposes of the appeal, which required demonstrating an arguable case for adducing further evidence.
Basten JA considered the limited information provided regarding the grounds of appeal and the prospects of success. His Honour noted that the appellant had not demonstrated that the appeal had a reasonable prospect of success, nor had he established a basis for adducing further evidence on appeal. The court also addressed an application to waive the rule limiting the length of summary of argument, finding no basis for such a waiver in this straightforward factual case.
The notice of motion filed on 8 December 2020 was dismissed with costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
Notice of motion filed 8 December 2020 dismissed with costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.