McEvoy v Wagglens Pty Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 6 min read

Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: McEvoy v Wagglens Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 330
Hearing dates: 14 December 2020
Date of orders: 14 December 2020
Decision date: 14 December 2020
Before: Basten JA
Decision:

Notice of motion filed 8 December 2020 dismissed with costs.

Catchwords:

APPEAL – stay – application for stay of garnishee pending appeal – appeal from judgment in Division on appeal from Local Court – respondent seeking to enforce costs orders – garnishee order issued – whether application for leave had reasonable prospects of success – small amount relative to statutory threshold for appeal as of right – no statement of specific grounds – likelihood of success leading to reversal of costs orders – evidence of non-recoverability if payments obtained

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – subpoenas and notices to produce – application to issue for purposes of appeal – need to show arguable case for adducing further evidence on appeal

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – appeal – submissions – application for waiver of rule limiting length of summary of argument – straightforward factual case – no basis for lengthy submissions

Legislation Cited:

Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A

Category:Procedural and other rulings
Parties: Fentin McEvoy (Applicant)
Wagglens Pty Ltd (First Respondent)
Roderick Cloonan Marr (Second Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
Applicant unrepresented
Ms K MacDonald (Solicitor) (Respondents)

Solicitors:
Applicant unrepresented
KMD Law and Advisory (Respondents)
File Number(s): 2020/173957
 Decision under appeal 
Court or tribunal:
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction:
Common Law Division
Citation:

[2020] NSWSC 575

Date of Decision:
15 May 2020
Before:
Ierace J
File Number(s):
2019/45874

Judgment

  1. BASTEN JA: The applicant, Fentin McEvoy, brought proceedings in the Local Court seeking to recover an amount of $26,250 from the first respondent, Wagglens Pty Ltd. The amount was claimed as unpaid wages due under a 12 month contract of employment which ran from 25 May 2011 to 25 May 2012. The matter had a chequered history in the Local Court; the claim was finally dismissed on 23 October 2018. A reopening application was dismissed on 4 December 2018.

  2. On 11 February 2019, the applicant filed a summons seeking leave to appeal in the Common Law Division. (The summons and a number of other documents are missing from the white folder.) Judgment was delivered in the Common Law Division on 15 May 2020, refusing leave to appeal.

  3. A notice of intention to seek leave to appeal from that decision was filed 11 June 2020, although the summons suggests it was served on 18 June 2020, a few days out of time. More significantly, the summons seeking leave to appeal was not filed until 20 October 2020, that is about two months out of time. There has been an exchange of affidavits between the parties which have been e-filed out of hours, and even the night before the hearing, which seems to be becoming a practice. I have not read the affidavits, which, it appears, related primarily to explaining issues of timing of the filing of documents…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read McEvoy v Wagglens Pty Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2020] NSWCA 330
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appeal concerned an application for a stay of a garnishee order pending an appeal. The appellant, McEvoy, sought to stay the enforcement of costs orders made against him in the District Court, which had arisen from an appeal from the Local Court. The respondent, Wagglens Pty Ltd, sought to enforce these costs orders through a garnishee order.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether McEvoy had an arguable case with reasonable prospects of success on appeal, a threshold requirement for obtaining a stay of the garnishee order. This involved considering whether the appeal itself had a reasonable prospect of success, particularly given the relatively small amount of the costs orders in relation to the statutory threshold for an appeal as of right, and the lack of specific grounds of appeal being articulated. A further issue related to an application to issue subpoenas and notices to produce for the purposes of the appeal, which required demonstrating an arguable case for adducing further evidence.

Basten JA considered the limited information provided regarding the grounds of appeal and the prospects of success. His Honour noted that the appellant had not demonstrated that the appeal had a reasonable prospect of success, nor had he established a basis for adducing further evidence on appeal. The court also addressed an application to waive the rule limiting the length of summary of argument, finding no basis for such a waiver in this straightforward factual case.

The notice of motion filed on 8 December 2020 was dismissed with costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

Notice of motion filed 8 December 2020 dismissed with costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.