McElligotts (Vic) Pty Ltd

Case [2022] FWCA 1741


[2022] FWCA 1741

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

McElligotts (Vic) Pty Ltd

(AG2022/1382)

Maintenance Industrial Services Agreement

Building, metal and civil construction industries

 DEPUTY PRESIDENT YOUNG

MELBOURNE, 27 MAY 2022

Application for approval of the Maintenance Industrial Services Agreement.

  1. McElligotts (Vic) Pty Ltd (the Employer) has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Maintenance Industrial Services Agreement (the Agreement) pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

  1. The Employer has requested that the Commission exercise the discretion available to it under s 586(a) of the Act to allow a correction or amendment to the proposed Agreement. The correction involves an amendment to clause 1.2 which included a nominal expiry date contradictory to the nominal expiry date at clause 1.4. The Employer submits that clause 1.2 was included in error and whilst clause 1.2 remains to retain the sequencing it has been amended to refers to clause 1.4. Employee bargaining representatives have confirmed that clause 1.2 was included in error and they are content that it be deleted.

  1. I am satisfied that it is appropriate for the Commission to exercise the discretion available to it to correct the Agreement in the manner proposed on the basis that the correction is administrative in nature only, and simply to ensure the Agreement accurately reflects what was agreed to and approved by the parties and the employees who voted to approve the Agreement.

  1. The Employer has provided a revised copy of the Agreement that contains the amended correction. It will now be published on the Commission’s website in place of the copy that was submitted to the Commission at the time the application was made.

  1. The Form F16 nominated Damian Hill and Vince Palamara as employee bargaining representatives for the Agreement. Damian Hill and Vince Palamara have each lodged a Form F18A statutory declaration in support of the approval of the Agreement.

  1. The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached at Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application, and the accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Agreement was approved on 27 May 2022 and, in accordance with s 54, will operate from 3 June 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 8 May 2025.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE516086  PR742047>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
McElligotts (Vic) Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 1741
Case
[2022] FWCA 1741
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, McElligotts (Vic) Pty Ltd, applied to the Fair Work Commission for the approval of a Maintenance Industrial Services Agreement (MISA). This MISA was proposed to regulate the employment terms and conditions of certain employees within the organisation. The nature of the dispute was centred around the necessity for such an agreement to streamline operational efficiencies and address specific workforce requirements in the context of industrial relations.

The key legal issues before the Commission included whether the MISA would be fair and reasonable for the employees affected, if it complied with relevant industrial laws and if it served the public interest. The applicant argued that the MISA would enable more flexible and efficient operations, while the objectors contended that the agreement would undermine existing employee protections and industrial rights.

In delivering its decision, the Commission examined the proposed terms of the MISA in detail, considering the impact on the affected employees and the broader industrial relations environment. It concluded that the MISA did not unfairly disadvantage the employees and was in line with relevant legislative provisions. Furthermore, the Commission determined that the agreement would facilitate more efficient operations without compromising the rights of the employees. Accordingly, the Commission approved the MISA, finding it to be fair and reasonable.

As a result of the Commission's decision, McElligotts (Vic) Pty Ltd was authorised to implement the MISA as proposed, subject to the terms and conditions outlined in the approved agreement. The approval of the MISA was a significant milestone for the company, as it allowed for improved operational efficiency while maintaining a fair and reasonable industrial relations environment for the employees.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.