McDonough v The Queen

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

McDONOUGH

v

THE QUEEN

[2022] HCASL 69
D1/2022

  1. This application for special leave to appeal from a judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Northern Territory (Grant CJ, Barr and Brownhill JJ) does not raise a question with sufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. The application should be dismissed.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

M.M. Gordon J.J. Edelman
7 April 2022
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read McDonough v The Queen and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2022] HCASL 69
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties involved in this case were McDonough and the Crown, represented by The Queen. The dispute centred around an application for special leave to appeal a judgment made by the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Northern Territory. The applicant, McDonough, sought to appeal against a decision that had been made in his case, and the Crown opposed the application.

The primary legal issue that the court had to address was whether the application for special leave to appeal raised a question with sufficient prospects of success. This was a critical determination, as the granting of special leave to appeal is not a matter of right but rather a discretionary power exercised by the court. The court needed to consider whether the applicant had a reasonable chance of success in the appeal, and if the appeal raised an important legal question that warranted further judicial consideration.

In examining the merits of the application, the court considered the arguments presented by both parties and the grounds for the appeal. After careful deliberation, the court concluded that the application did not raise a question with sufficient prospects of success. The court found that the arguments put forward by McDonough were not strong enough to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. As a result, the court dismissed the application and directed the Registrar to prepare the necessary order.

No further orders were made by the court beyond the dismissal of the application and the direction to the Registrar to prepare the order. The decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Northern Territory was upheld, and McDonough's appeal was not granted. The court's decision in this matter highlights the importance of establishing a strong legal basis for an appeal and the discretionary nature of the grant of special leave to appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.