McDonald and Holmes

Case

[2012] FamCA 1067


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

MCDONALD & HOLMES [2012] FamCA 1067
FAMILY LAW – PROPERTY – Defacto property settlement
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 44(6)
APPLICANT: Mr McDonald
RESPONDENT: Ms Holmes
FILE NUMBER: HBC 829 of 2012
DATE DELIVERED: 18 December 2012
PLACE DELIVERED: Hobart
PLACE HEARD: Hobart
JUDGMENT OF: Benjamin J
HEARING DATE: 18 December 2012

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: Ms Foale
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: Simmons Wolfhagen
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: In person
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: Not Applicable

Orders

  1. Leave be given to the parties granting an extension of time to enable consent orders to be made pursuant to s 44(6) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym McDonald & Holmes has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT HOBART

FILE NUMBER: HBC 829/2012

Mr McDonald

Applicant

And

Ms Holmes

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. This is an application by parties for consent orders in relation to property adjustment under s 90SE, s 90SG or s 90SM of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (“the Act”) where the period of time has expired.

  2. By implication the parties are seeking an extension of the time to enable the consent orders to be made pursuant to s 44(6) of the Act. The parties jointly apply for those orders and have assured the court that it is an appropriate order but for the time limit having expired.

  3. It would impose financial hardship upon the parties if they were required to commence proceedings in the Family Court for leave, in the circumstances as they now find themselves.

  4. Accordingly leave be given to the parties to amend their application for consent orders to provide for leave under s 44(6) of the Act and I give leave under that section.

I certify that the preceding four (4) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of the Honourable Justice Benjamin delivered on 18 December 2012.

Associate:

Date:  18 December 2012

Areas of Law

  • Family Law

  • Statutory Interpretation

Legal Concepts

  • Consent

  • Limitation Periods

  • Statutory Construction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0