McDermott & McDermott

Case [2017] FamCA 376


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

MCDERMOTT & MCDERMOTT AND ORS [2017] FamCA 376

FAMILY LAW – PROPERTY – Where subsequent to separation Receiver and Liquidator appointed to parties’ corporate and partnership entities – Where significant adverse credit findings as to the husband’s evidence – Where husband retained significant funds the property of the receivership/liquidation – Where issues as to the proper “pool of assets” for adjustment purposes – Where husband’s financial and other misconduct adversely affect the ongoing receivership/liquidation and the costs thereof.

FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – Where parties agree as to equal shared parental responsibility – Where parties agree that children to live primarily with the mother – Where discrete issue for determination the children’s time with the father – Consideration of the children’s best interests.

Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 60B, 60CA, 60CC, 60CC(2), 60CC(2)(a), 60CC(2)(b), 60CC(3), 61DA, 61DA(2), 61DA(3), 61DA(4), 65DAA, 65DAA(6), 75(2), 79, 79(1), 79(2), 79(4), 90SM(4)

Bevan & Bevan [2014] FamCAFC 19
Black and Kellner (1992) FLC 92-287
Chang & Su [2002] FamCA 156
Chapman & Chapman [2014] FamCAFC 91
Goode and Goode [2006] FamCA 1346
Harris (1991) 104 FLR 458
Kannis and Kannis (2003) FLC 93-135
Kessey and Kessey (1994) FLC 92-495
Lovine & Connor and Anor (2012) FLC 93-515
McCall & Clark (2009) FLC 93-405; [2009] FamCAFC 92
McDermott &McDermott [2014] FamCA 245
McDermott &McDermott [2015] FamCA 87
McDermott & McDermott [2015] FamCA 574
McDermott &McDermott [2016] FamCA 613
Marriage of Black and Kellner (1992) 15 Fam LR 343
Marriage of Weir (1992) 16 Fam LR 154
Mazorski v Albright [2007] FamCA 520
Mezzacappa v Mezzacappa [1987] FamCA 20
MRR v GRR [2010] HCA 4
Russell & Russell (1999) FLC 92-877
Scott & Danton [2014] FamCAFC 203
Stanford v Stanford [2012] HCA 52
Stein v Stein [1986] FamCA 27
Teal & Teal [2010] FamCAFC 120
Weir v Weir (1993) FLC 92-338

APPLICANT: Mr McDermott
FIRST RESPONDENT: Ms McDermott
SECOND RESPONDENT: B Pty Ltd (In Liquidation)
THIRD RESPONDENT: Mr M (Liquidator)
FILE NUMBER: SYC 70 of 2014
DATE DELIVERED: 19 May 2017
PLACE DELIVERED: Parramatta
PLACE HEARD: Parramatta
JUDGMENT OF: Foster J
HEARING DATE: 29 February 2016, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 March 2016, 13 December 2016

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: Mr Hodgson & Ms Picker
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: Hancock Alldis & Roskov Lawyers & Notaries Public
COUNSEL FOR THE FIRST RESPONDENT: Mr Lethbridge SC & Ms Eldershaw
SOLICITOR FOR THE FIRST RESPONDENT: Campbell Paton & Taylor
COUNSEL FOR THE THIRD RESPONDENT LIQUIDATOR: Mr Miller SC & Ms Stanton
SOLICITOR FOR THE THIRD RESPONDENT LIQUIDATOR: Collin Biggers & Paisley

Orders

PARENTING

  1. That all previous parenting orders be discharged.

  2. That the father and mother have equal shared parental responsibility for the children K born … 2006 and AA born … 2009.

  3. That the children live with the mother.

  4. That the children spend time with the father as agreed between the father and mother in writing such writing to include SMS or email communication and failing agreement as follows:

    a)during school…

Continue reading McDermott & McDermott

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
McDermott & McDermott [2017] FamCA 376
Case
[2017] FamCA 376
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This case involved property and parenting disputes between a husband and wife, identified as the parties. A significant aspect of the property dispute concerned the appointment of a Receiver and Liquidator to the parties' corporate and partnership entities. The court was required to determine the proper pool of assets for adjustment purposes, particularly in light of adverse credit findings against the husband and his retention of funds belonging to the receivership/liquidation, which impacted the ongoing receivership and its associated costs. In relation to parenting, the parties had reached an agreement on equal shared parental responsibility and that the children would live primarily with the mother, leaving only the discrete issue of the children's time with the father to be determined by the court, with consideration of the children's best interests.

The court's reasoning in the property division was heavily influenced by the husband's financial misconduct and the consequent appointment of a Receiver and Liquidator. The court applied principles relating to the identification and division of assets when corporate and partnership entities are involved, especially where there has been an intermingling of assets and a lack of clear record-keeping. The court also considered the impact of the husband's conduct on the receivership and liquidation process. In parenting matters, the court's determination of the children's time with the father was guided by the overarching principle of the children's best interests, as stipulated in the relevant legislation.

The court made detailed orders regarding parenting, establishing equal shared parental responsibility with the children living primarily with the mother, and outlining specific arrangements for the children's time with the father during school terms and holidays, including provisions for birthdays and other special occasions. The orders also included provisions for communication between parents and children, information sharing regarding the children's welfare, and restrictions on parental criticism. In relation to property, the court ordered the husband to transfer his interests in several properties and leaseholdings to the wife, declared the wife the sole beneficial owner of assets at a specific property and of the partnership's assets, and ordered the husband to pay a sum of $226,000 to the wife. The court also made provisions for the execution of documents by the wife on behalf of the husband if he failed to comply with the orders.

Orders

Orders of the court

PARENTING

1.

That all previous parenting orders be discharged.

2.

That the father and mother have equal shared parental responsibility for the children K born … 2006 and AA born … 2009.

3.

That the children live with the mother.

4.

That the children spend time with the father as agreed between the father and mother in writing such writing to include SMS or email communication and failing agreement as follows:

a) during school term each fourth weekend for a block of four nights from 4.00 pm Thursday to 4.00 pm Monday and for the purpose of implementing this order:

(i) with the first of such blocks shall coincide with the third weekend after the resumption of school term;

(ii) provided always that should such time coincide with the Mother’s Day weekend or sports club (as opposed to sports club camp) the children’s time with the father shall be changed to the following weekend without interruption to the sequence of weekends that otherwise would apply and for the purposes of implementation of this order the wife shall inform the father by SMS or email not less than seven days prior to the weekend in question of any forthcoming sports club event that would interfere with the children’s time with the father as provided above.

b) during school holidays:

(i) in even numbered years from 9.00 am on the first Saturday following the conclusion of school term to 4.00 pm on the Saturday closest to the midpoint of the school holiday period; and

(ii) in odd numbered years from 9.00 am on the Saturday falling closest to the midpoint of the school holiday period to 4.00 pm on the last Saturday of the school holiday period;

(iii) if the children are to spend time with the father during a period that conflicts with sports club camp then that week of the children’s time with the father being the week from Saturday to Saturday shall be changed to the week that follows on from the last week of the holiday period that the children would spend with the father in even numbered years or the week that immediately precedes the holiday period that the children spend with the father in odd numbered years.

5.

That notwithstanding the above orders:

a) the children shall spend time with the father on the children’s birthdays from 3.30 pm to 7.00 pm if the birthday falls on a school day and from 1.00 pm to 7.00 pm if the birthday falls on a non-school day provided always that the father shall advise the mother by SMS or email communication not less than 72 hours prior to the birthday whether he proposes to spend time with the children as provided;

b) the children shall spend time with the father on Father’s Day from 10.00 am to 7.00 pm provided always that the father shall advise the mother by SMS or email communication not less than 72 hours prior to Father’s Day whether he proposes to spend time with the children as provided;

c) except when Easter occurs during a school holiday period the children shall spend time with the father on Easter Sunday in even numbered years from 10.00 am to 7.00 pm provided always that the father shall advise the mother by SMS or email communication not less than 72 hours prior to Easter Sunday whether he proposes to spend time with the children as provided.

6.

The mother and father shall be at liberty to have telephone communication with the children while they are in the care of the other parent each Monday, Wednesday and Friday between 6.00 pm and 8.00 pm and on Christmas Day, Easter Sunday, Father’s Day, Mother’s Day, each party’s birthday and the children’s birthdays by placing a call to either of the children’s mobile phone numbers.

7.

That the mother and father shall ensure that the other is kept informed as soon as is reasonably practicable of:

a) any serious medical problems or illnesses suffered by the children or either of them, including the details of any hospital or medical centre to which the children have or child has been taken in case of an emergency;

b) any medication that has been prescribed for the children or either of them that needs to be taken during the time the child is in the care of the other;

c) any appointments with any specialist medical doctor, dentist or other health professional and the name and contact details of such professional;

d) unless the appointment was attended by both, the outcome of any attendance by the children or either of them on any specialist medical or other health professional, including copies of any medical reports provided by that professional within 3 days of receipt of such report;

e) any changes to their residential address and other contact details within 48 hours of the change occurring;

f) any other relevant matter to the welfare of the children or either of them.

8.

That both the mother and father are permitted to liaise directly with the children’s education provider, sporting bodies and/or extracurricular organisations to obtain any necessary information about their progress and both are to do all things necessary to authorise the school, sporting bodies and/or other organisations to release such information as may be requested by the other to the extent permitted by law.

9.

That both the mother and father shall provide authorities to any education provider that provide services to the children to provide to both parents copies of the children’s school reports, school circulars, newsletters, school photograph order forms and invitations to attend any school activities to which parents are invited to attend and for both parents to be named on all school and extracurricular records as emergency contacts.

10.

That both the mother and father shall do all acts and things to authorise any medical practitioner, dentist, counsellor or other health professional who treats the children or either of them to provide information to the other upon request by the other to the extent permitted by law.

11.

That both the mother and father are permitted to attend on parent teacher interviews, concerts, carnivals, sporting matches, training sessions, prize days, and other events involving the children or either of them at school or in the context of extra-curricular activities to which parents are ordinarily invited, notwithstanding that such event occurs at a time when the children are in the care of the other parent pursuant to these orders.

12.

That both the mother and father are restrained from criticising or denigrating the other or member of the other’s household and from discussing these proceedings in the presence or hearing of the children.

13.

That except as otherwise agreed by the mother and father in writing such writing to include SMS or email communication the father shall collect the children from the gate at the D Street property at the commencement of his time with the children and return the children to the front gate of the D Street property at the conclusion of his time with the children.

14.

That the mother provide to the father not less than two months’ notice in writing such writing to include SMS or email communication of any proposal by her to relocate the residence of the children outside the state of New South Wales.

PROPERTY

15.

That within 28 days from the date of these orders the husband do all things necessary to transfer to the wife his interest in the properties known as “D Street” and “Property BB”, E Town NSW.

16.

That within 28 days from the date of these orders the husband do all things necessary to transfer to the wife his interest in any lease holding, Crown Grant, water licence, clearing permit relating or attaching to any parcel or parcels of land comprised in D Street including Leases …, …, …, ….

17.

That within 28 days from the date of these orders the husband do all things necessary to transfer to the wife his interest in the property known as “Property CC” NSW being Certificate of Title Folio Identifiers … and ....

18.

That the wife be declared as against the husband the sole beneficial and legal owner of assets, equipment and stock owned by either of them situate on the property at D Street.

19.

That the partnership “Mr & Ms McDermott” be dissolved at midnight on the date the Receiver/Manager’s notification is sent to the parties and that thereafter the wife be declared against the husband the sole legal and beneficial owner of the assets, including plant and equipment, of the said partnership including but not limited to:

a) Tractor;

b) Excavator;

c) Scraper;

d) Backhoe;

e) Back Plough;

f) 4WD Regn ...

20.

That within 28 days from the date of these orders the husband pay to the wife the sum of $226,000.00.

21.

Pursuant to section 106A of the Family Law Act 1975 in the event that the husband refuses or neglects to comply with any direction or order to execute a deed or instrument as required by or to give effect to these orders within seven days of a written request by the wife or the receiver/liquidator, the wife is appointed to execute the deed or instrument in the name of the husband and to do all acts and all things necessary to give validity and operation to the deed or instrument.

22.

That in the event of any application for costs in relation to these proceedings then the applicant for any such costs order file and serve written submissions in support of such application within 28 days from the date of these orders and the respondent to any such application file written submissions in response within a further 14 days and that thereafter, absent any application for the Court to hear oral submissions judgement be reserved to Chambers.

23.

That otherwise applications before the Court are dismissed and proceedings removed from the active pending cases list.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

The Receiver requested the husband to provide details of amounts owed by the debtors and what had been paid to date. The husband has provided no such information to the Receiver.The Receiver’s Conclusions The Receiver expressed an opinion that a liquidator should be appointed to the company as the company was insolvent and such appointment would facilitate the liquidator investigating the following and providing reports to creditors and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission:a)actions of the director using company funds for personal or non-company related purposes;b)the company’s financial interest in other assets;c)the company’s interest in assets claimed as owned by the partnership;d)the company’s interest in jobs claimed to be partnership;e)compliance with the directors statutory duties;f)payments that may be recoverable by a liquidator of the company;g)any insolvent trading claims; andh)the conduct of examinations and the issue of summonses for the production of documents or orders for production addressed to the directors and any other relevant third-party. As to the question of appointing a Receiver to the Partnership and Z, the Receiver was appointed to conduct and manage “the business known as [B] Pty Ltd” and as part of the process the Receiver has endeavoured to identify and secure property of the company. However:a)there was uncertainty as to the identity of the owner of some items of plant and equipment;b)there had been an intermingling of the business and the assets of the company, the partnership and Z;c)there had been inconsistency in the books and records and information provided by the husband and wife; and d)as a consequence of this uncertainty, inconsistency and intermingling, the Receiver had been impeded in his ability to identify and secure the property of the company and that of the construction business (which is conducted not only by B but also by the Partnership and Z). In the circumstances outlined above, the Receiver was prepared to be appointed as the Liquidator of the company and Receiver of the Partnership and Z. On 21 July 2014 the following orders were made:UPON THE COURT BEING SATISFIED: A.That it would be appropriate for the Receiver to apply to the Court to wind up the Company and to appoint him or such other person as the Court considers fit as liquidator of the company;B.That it would be appropriate for the Receiver to apply to the Court for him or such other person to be appointed as the Court considers fit without security as receiver and manager of the property, assets and undertaking of [Z] Pty Ltd together … with such other order necessary to give effect to sameC.That it would be appropriate for the receiver to apply to the Court for him or such other person as the Court considers fit to be appointed without security as Receiver and Manager of the property, assets and undertaking of the partnership of the Applicant and Respondent in the substantive proceedings trading as “[B]” together with such other order necessary to give effect to same.THEN THE COURT ORDERS THAT:2.Leave is granted to the receiver to apply to the Court to wind up the Company and to appoint him liquidator of the company.[Z] Pty Ltd3.That [Mr M] of [M Advisory], … Sydney be appointed as Receiver and manager of the income and property of [Z] Pty Ltd.4.Pursuant to section 420 of the Corporations Act 2001 the Receiver shall conduct and manage the business known as [Z] Pty Ltd.5.In exercising any of his duties under these orders, the Receiver shall have all the powers ordinarily available to him pursuant to section 420 of the Corporations Act 2001.6.That the Receiver’s right to be paid in respect of the matters the subject of the indemnity as defined in the orders made today be paid firstly by [Z] Pty Ltd and in default of sufficient funds being available from the said company by the Husband and Wife jointly and his remuneration be calculated in accordance with the standard rates effective from time to time of the Receiver [Mr M].7.There be no security given by the Receiver.8.The Receiver is required to provide to the Court and to each of the parties an interim report at the expiration of two months from the date of these orders as to the financial circumstances of [B] and [Z] Pty Ltd with such report to include any recommendation that in the opinion of the receiver is appropriate as to the ongoing conduct of the business or its liquidation or winding up.9.The Husband and Wife do all necessary things and sign all necessary documents so as to cooperate with the Receiver and shall provide such documents, financial records, bank statements/books, tax records and any other financial document as required by the Receiver within 24 hours of a request by the Receiver and provide any other information sought by the Receiver which relates to the income, property or liabilities of [Z] Pty Ltd.10.That the Receiver shall submit accounts to the Husband and Wife on a monthly basis.“B”11.That [Mr M] of [M Advisory], … Sydney be appointed as Receiver and manager of the income and property of “[B]”.12.Pursuant to section 420 of the Corporations Act 2001 the Receiver shall conduct and manage the business known as “[B]”.13.In exercising any of his duties under these orders, the Receiver shall have all the powers ordinarily available to him pursuant to section 420 of the Corporations Act 2001.14.That the Receiver’s right to be paid in respect of the matters the subject of the indemnity as defined in the orders made today be paid firstly by “[B]” and in default of sufficient funds being available from the said company by the Husband and Wife jointly and his remuneration be calculated in accordance with the standard rates effective from time to time of the Receiver [Mr M].15. There be no security given by the Receiver.16.The Receiver is required to provide to the Court and to each of the parties an interim report at the expiration of two months from the date of these orders as to the financial circumstances of “[B]” with such report to include any recommendation that in the opinion of the receiver is appropriate as to the ongoing conduct of the business or its liquidation or winding up.17.The Husband and Wife do all necessary things and sign all necessary documents so as to cooperate with the Receiver and shall provide such documents, financial records, bank statements/books, tax records and any other financial document as required by the Receiver within 24 hours of a request by the Receiver and provide any other information sought by the Receiver which relates to the income, property or liabilities of “[B]”.18.That the Receiver shall submit accounts to the Husband and Wife on a monthly basis.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT:19.The Husband be ordered to deliver up to the Receiver the following forthwith:a.[Prime Mover];b.[Dolly];c.[LowLoader];20.An order nunc pro tunc that the Receiver is entitled to be indemnified out of the Company’s property (other than any security interest within the meaning of the Personal Property Securities Act 2009 and to which that Act applies, other than a transitional security interest within the meaning of that Act (PPSA Security Interest), that is perfected within the meaning of that Act for:a.Debt he incurs, in the performance or exercise, or purported performance or exercise, of any of his or her functions and powers as Receiver, for:i.Services rendered;ii.Goods bought;iii.Property hired, leased, used or occupied, including property consisting of goods that is subject to a lease that gives rise to a PPSA Security Interest in the goods;iv.The repayment of money borrowed;v.Interest in respect of money borrowed;vi.Borrowing costs;vii.Liability under section 220AAE, 220AAM, 220AAR, 221F (except 221F(12)), 221G (except 221G(4A)), 221YHDC(2), 221YHZD(1) or (1A), 221YN(1) of the former provisions of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 or any of the provisions of Subdivision 16-B in Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953;b.Any other debts or liabilities incurred, or damages or losses sustained, in good faith and without negligence, by the Receiver in the performance or exercise, or purported performance or exercise, of any of his or her functions or powers as Receiver; andc.His remuneration.21.An order nunc pro tunc that the administrator has a lien on the Company’s income and property, with priority over another security interest only in so far as the Indemnity has priority over debts secured by the other security interest, to secure the Indemnity.22.An order nunc pro tunc that order 7 of the orders made on 28 May 2014 be varied to substitute “420B” of the Corporations Act with “420”.23.An order nunc pro tunc that order 9 of the orders made on 28 May 2014 be varied to replace the word “remuneration” in the first line with “right to be paid in respect of these matters the subject of the Indemnity as defined in the orders of 21 July 2014” and the word “such” in the third line be replaced with “his”.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.