McCormick v Mt Pleasant Stud Farm Pty Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 12 min read

District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: McCormick v Mt Pleasant Stud Farm Pty Ltd [2021] NSWDC 415
Hearing dates: 17 August 2021
Date of orders: 19 August 2021
Decision date: 19 August 2021
Jurisdiction:Civil
Before: Sidis ADCJ
Decision:

See paragraph 49

Catchwords:

WORK ACCIDENT – leave to proceed out of time – work injury damages – point at which notice of intention to claim work injury damages should be made – application for leave to commence claim where statement of claim filed more than 6 years after work place injury

Legislation Cited:

Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW)

Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act1998 (NSW)

Cases Cited:

Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor [1996] HCA 25; (1996) 186 CLR 541

Gower v State of New South Wales [2018] NSWCA 132

Holt v Wynter [2000] NSWCA 128; (2000) NSWLR 128

Itex Graphix Pty Limited v Elliott [2002] NSWCA 104; (2002) 54 NSWLR 207

Salido v The Nominal Defendant (1993) 32 NSWLR 524

South Western Sydney Area Health Service v Gabriel [2001] NSWCA 477

Category:Procedural rulings
Parties: Mr S McCormick (applicant)
Mt Pleasant Stud Farm Pty Ltd (respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
Mr W Fitzsimmons SC and Ms S Warren for the applicant
Ms T Berberian and Mr R Perla for the respondent

Solicitors:
Lough & Wells Lawyers for the applicant
Leigh Virtue and Associates for the respondent
File Number(s): 2021/00015061

Judgment

  1. Sean McCormick, the applicant in this matter, was injured when he fell from a horse in the course of his employment as farm manager by the respondent, Mount Pleasant Stud Farm Pty Limited.

  2. The accident occurred on 29 December 2014. The applicant suffered injuries to his neck, back and right shoulder. Ongoing treatment of the injuries included surgery to repair the right rotator cuff and biceps and ultrasound injections in an attempt to relieve shoulder and neck pain.

  3. The applicant developed gastrointestinal symptoms that medical opinion related to the use of pain relieving medication relied upon by the applicant. A gastroscopy was performed on 19 October 2018.

  4. Medical records indicate that the applicant continued to suffer from significant pain and discomfort from the time of the accident to the date of the hearing of his application.

  5. The applicant lodged a workers compensation claim on 30 December 2014. He took a holiday but upon his return to work he was certified unfit to perform all of his duties. His employment was terminated on 13 February 2015. He has not, to date, returned to work.

  6. S 151D of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 required that a claim in respect of these injuries be made within 3 years of the date of injury. A statement of claim was filed on the applicant’s behalf on 18 January 2021 which, disregarding the periods of suspension provided for in the workers compensation legislation, was more than 6 years from the date of injury and 3 years out of time.

  7. The application for leave to bring proceedings out of time…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read McCormick v Mt Pleasant Stud Farm Pty Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2021] NSWDC 415
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Court of Australia, McCormick brought an action against Mt Pleasant Stud Farm Pty Ltd, a thoroughbred stud farm, seeking damages for injuries sustained at work. The plaintiff, an employee of the defendant, alleged that he suffered injuries during his employment, but did not file his statement of claim within the statutory six-year limitation period. Instead, he filed an application for leave to proceed out of time, arguing that he had not been aware of the full extent of his injuries until a significant period after the injury occurred. The legal issues for the court to decide included whether the plaintiff's application for leave to proceed out of time should be granted and the appropriate point at which notice of intention to claim work injury damages should be made.

The court considered the statutory requirement for notice of intention to claim work injury damages and the equitable principle of estoppel. The court found that the statutory provisions did not require notice of intention to be given at the time of the injury, but rather at the time when the plaintiff became aware of the full extent of their injuries. The court also found that the defendant was estopped from relying on the limitation period where the plaintiff had been induced to delay proceedings by the defendant's conduct. The court held that the plaintiff's application for leave to proceed out of time should be granted, and that the appropriate point at which notice of intention to claim work injury damages should be made was when the plaintiff became aware of the full extent of their injuries.

The court ordered that McCormick be granted leave to proceed out of time, and that the proceedings be allowed to continue. The court also ordered that the defendant bear the costs of the application. The court did not make any orders regarding the substantive claim for damages.

Orders

Orders of the court

See paragraph 49

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.