| [2025] FWCA 1589 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
McArthur River Mining Pty Ltd
(AG2025/1197)
MCARTHUR RIVER MINING PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025
| Mining industry | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT DOBSON | BRISBANE, 12 MAY 2025 |
Application for approval of the McArthur River Mining Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2025
This decision deals with an application made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the McArthur River Mining Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2025 (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by McArthur River Mining Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) distributed to employees appears to have a different name for the Agreement to that which was eventually made. I am satisfied that the Agreement would have been genuinely agreed to but for the minor procedural departure from the prescribed form requirements of the NERR under s.174(1A) of the Act and that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by this. Accordingly, I exercise the discretion conferred by s.188(5) of the Act.[1]
The Applicant has provided written undertakings. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
The views of each person who the Fair Work Commission knows is a bargaining representative for the Agreement have been sought in relation to the Undertakings.
Pursuant to s.190(3) of the Act, I accept the undertakings.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, having regard to the Statement of Principles,[2] on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declarations, I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):
· Clause 2.4(d) – Redundancy
· Clause 5.1(a) – Annual Leave
· Clause 5.6 – Compassionate Leave
However, noting clause 1.3 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU), “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) and United Workers Union (UWU) have each lodged a Form F18 statutory declaration giving notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the CEPU, AMWU and UWU.
The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 11 May 2029.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others[2019] FWCFB 318 [117].
[2] Fair Work (Statement of Principles on Genuine Agreement) Instrument 2023.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE528990 PR787243>
- AGLC
- McArthur River Mining Pty Ltd [2025] FWCA 1589
- Case
- [2025] FWCA 1589
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the Full Bench had to decide were whether the provisions of the Enterprise Agreement were fair and reasonable in all aspects, and if they complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission examined the provisions regarding wages, working conditions, and dispute resolution mechanisms. The union argued that the proposed agreement adequately protected workers' rights and improved conditions, while the company contended that certain provisions were unreasonable and would impose undue financial burdens.
In delivering the decision, the Full Bench found that while the proposed agreement contained several provisions that were fair and reasonable, some aspects did not meet the standards set by the Fair Work Act. The Commission highlighted specific clauses related to wage increases and working conditions that it deemed unfair. It also noted that the dispute resolution mechanisms proposed were not sufficiently robust to protect workers' rights effectively. Consequently, the Full Bench rejected the application for approval of the Enterprise Agreement 2025, citing that it failed to meet the necessary standards of fairness and reasonableness.
The Full Bench ordered that the application for approval of the McArthur River Mining Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2025 be dismissed. It directed the parties to return to the negotiating table to revise the agreement in a manner that addressed the concerns raised and complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The decision underscored the importance of balancing the interests of employers and employees while ensuring that workers' rights are adequately protected under enterprise agreements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.