Mazzio (Migration)

[2021] AATA 5344

Mazzio (Migration) [2021] AATA 5344 (20 December 2021)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:  Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANTS:  Mrs Marielci Carla Mazzio Mr Eduardo De Franca Neto Miss Luiza Mazzio Franca

REPRESENTATIVE:  Mr Claudio Garzini (MARN: 1803676)

CASE NUMBER:  2102773

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):           BCC2019/5799225

MEMBER:  Peter Emmerton

DATE:  20 December 2021

PLACE OF DECISION:  Adelaide

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the applications for Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN) visas for reconsideration, with the direction that the first named applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) visa:

·cl 187.233. of Schedule 2 to the Regulations

Statement made on 20 December 2021 at 12:07pm

CATCHWORDS

MIGRATION – Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN) visa – Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) – Direct Entry stream – Conference and Event Organiser – subject of an approved nomination – decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION

Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 65

Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), r 5.19; Schedule 2, cl. 187.233

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs to refuse to grant the applicants Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN) visas under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act).

1. The applicants applied for the visas on 15 November 2019. At the time of application, Class RN contained one subclass: Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme).

1. The criteria for a Subclass 187 visa are set out in Part 187 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations). The primary criteria must be satisfied by at least one applicant. Other members of the family unit, if any, who are applicants for the visa need satisfy only the secondary criteria. Applicants seeking to satisfy the primary criteria must meet the 'Common criteria', as well as the criteria of one of two alternative visa streams: the Temporary Residence Transition stream, or the Direct Entry stream.

1. In the present case, the first named applicant (the applicant) is seeking the visa in the Direct Entry stream, to work in the nominated position of Conference and Event Organiser, ANZSCO 149311, Skill level 2.

1. The delegate refused to grant the visas because the applicant did not meet cl 187.233 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations because the nomination was not approved.

1. The applicant was represented in relation to the review by their registered migration agent.

1. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

1. The issue in the present case is whether the nomination has been approved.

1. In determining the applicant’s claims the Tribunal must first make findings of fact on material matters in dispute. This may involve an assessment of credibility and in so doing, the Tribunal is aware of the need and importance of being sensitive to the circumstances and the difficulties applicants often face before the Tribunal in their individual circumstances.

1. The applicants rely on the evidence given before the Tribunal together with written submissions and supporting evidence provided to the Tribunal and previously to the department.

Nomination of a position

1. Clause 187.233 as applicable in this case is set out in full in an attachment to this decision. Essentially, it requires that that the position to which the application relates be the subject of an application for approval of a nomination in the Direct Entry stream, located in regional Australia. The position must be the one that was the subject of the declaration made as part of the current visa application. In addition, where the associated nomination was made on or after 1 July 2017, it must identify the applicant in relation to the position.

1. In addition, this criterion also requires that:

   ·the person who will employ the applicant is the person who made nomination

·the nomination has been approved and has not been subsequently withdrawn

·there is no ‘adverse information’ known to Immigration about the person who made the nomination or a person ‘associated with’ that person (within the meaning of r.1.13A and r.1.13B); or it is reasonable to disregard any such information

·the position is still available to the applicant, and

·the visa application was made no more than six months after the nomination of the position was approved.

1. On 15 November 2019 an application was lodged for a residence visa under the Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN 187) visa in favour of the visa applicant. On 19 February 2021 the application was refused.

1. On 20 December 2021, the Tribunal set the Department’s decision aside and substituted a decision approving the appointment for the position of Conference and Events Organiser, ANZSCO 149311.1 Based on evidence provided in that application, the Tribunal is satisfied the approved position is the same as the one that was the subject of the relevant r.5.19(4)(h)(ii) nomination application and identifies the applicant in relation to the position. The Tribunal is also satisfied the position is the same as that in the visa application declaration. Therefore cl.187.233(1) is met.

1. The Tribunal relies on its findings in the nomination application to find the person who will employ the applicant is the person who was the nominator in the application for approval. Therefore cl. 187.233(2) is met. In-light of the Tribunal’s approval of the appointment under r.5.19(4), the Tribunal finds that the visa applicant now meets the requirements of cl.187.233(3).

1. The Tribunal is also satisfied on all the evidence before it that the relevant appointment has not been withdrawn and is still available to the visa applicant. The Tribunal is satisfied that no adverse information is known to Immigration about the person who made the nomination, or a person associated with that person. Therefore cl.187.233(4), (4A) and (5) are met. The application for the visa was made on 15 November 2019, which is before the nomination was approved on 20 December 2021. As the visa application was made on a date which is no more than 6 months after the approval, cl.187.233 (6) is met.

1. The Tribunal therefore finds the visa applicant satisfies the requirements specified in cl.187.233. Given these findings, the appropriate course is to remit the visa applications to the Minister to consider the remaining criteria for the visas.

DECISION

1. The Tribunal remits the applications for Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN) visas for reconsideration, with the direction that the first named applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) visa:

   · cl.187.233 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations Peter Emmerton

   Member

1 See MRT decision file ref. 2006575

ATTACHMENT A

187.233        (1)      The position to which the application relates is the position:

(a)nominated in an application for approval that:

(i)identifies the applicant in relation to the position; and

(ii)is made in relation to a visa in a Direct Entry stream; and

(iii)seeks to meet the requirements of subregulation 5.19(12); and

(b)in relation to which the declaration mentioned in paragraph 1114C(3)(d) of Schedule 1 was made in the application for the grant of the visa.

(2)       The person who will employ the applicant is the person who made the nomination.

(3)       The Minister has approved the nomination.

(4)      The nomination has not subsequently been withdrawn. (4A) Either:

(a)there is no adverse information known to Immigration about the person who made

the nomination or a person associated with that person; or

(b)it is reasonable to disregard any adverse information known to Immigration about the person who made the nomination or a person associated with that person.

(5)       The position is still available to the applicant.

(6)       The application for the visa is made no more than 6 months after the Minister approved the nomination.