Mazzeo v Inner West Council

Case

[2018] NSWLEC 1142

21 March 2018

No judgment structure available for this case.

Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Mazzeo v Inner West Council [2018] NSWLEC 1142
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 27 February 2018
Date of orders: 21 March 2018
Decision date: 21 March 2018
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Chilcott C
Decision:

See [4] below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Catherine Mazzeo (Applicant)
Inner West Council (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitors:
Mr D Briggs, D G Briggs & Associates (Applicant)
Mr J Strati, Inner West Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/294604
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The Applicant is granted leave to rely on amended plans;

  2. The Appeal is upheld;

  3. The Applicant’s section 96 application (number M/2017/74) to modify Development Consent No. D/2012/499, which approved alterations and additions to existing dwelling at 104 Curtis Street, Balmain, is determined by approving the modifications as set out in “Annexure A”.

  4. As a consequence of order (3), development Consent No. D/2012/499 is now subject to the consolidated, modified conditions of development consent set out in “Annexure B”.

  5. Each party is to pay its own costs.

……………………….

Michael Chilcott

Commissioner of the Court

Annexure A (26.4 KB, pdf)

Annexure B (146 KB, pdf)

Decision last updated: 21 March 2018

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

1