May v Redland City Council

Case

[2013] QPEC 69

20 SEPTEMBER 2013

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2013] QPEC 69

PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT COURT

JUDGE ROBIN QC

P & E Appeal No 3558 of 2013

JOHN MAY and ANOTHER  Applicant

and

REDLAND CITY COUNCIL  Respondent

BRISBANE

10.36 AM, FRIDAY, 20 SEPTEMBER 2013

JUDGMENT

CATCHWORDS

Developer approval changed to delete requirement for retention of a farm dam considered useful for wildlife in deference to practical difficulties 

Sustainable Planning Act 2009 s369

HIS HONOUR:   I make an order as per initialled draft.  The effect of the order made is to change the detail of a reconfiguration approved by an order of Judge Rackemann that had become possible in consequence of the outcome of an appeal decided by me, May v Redland Shire Council [2009] QPEC 106; [2010] QPELR 225 The best efforts of all involved to save a farm dam, which in the approved plan of reconfiguration straddled lots 7 and 8, have been defeated by various considerations. It’s now proposed, with that the Council, presumably, reluctantly agreeing, is that the dam may be filled, contrary to earlier expectations that it would be available for wildlife enjoying the environment which the development conditions sought to preserve. Wildlife now won’t have that particular facility. There seems no escape from bowing to the exigencies of what is practicable on the ground.

______________________

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

0

May v Redland Shire Council [2009] QPEC 106