Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Statutory Material Cited
0
-
Pell v Hodges
[2007] NSWCA 234
Citation 1
…nation for such delays. Her case is not improved if investigations were carried out with reasonable diligence, but proved negative."[8] [7] [2007] NSWCA 234 [8] paragraph 44…
-
Savcor Pty Ltd v Cathodic Protection International APS
[2005] VSCA 213
Citation 2
…been made by Summons and not ex parte.[2] [2] McNamara v Cameron (1890) 16 VLR 108 at 110 and Savcor Pty Ltd v Catholic Protection International APS [2005] VSCA 213 at paragraph 21 17 In Ramsay v Madgwicks (a firm) ,[3] Young CJ held that the test to be applied is the same as in the former Rule 8.01. The former R…
-
Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor
[1996] HCA 25
Citation 3
…ty is left somewhat up in the air because of the lack of clarity in the defendant's affidavit of the matters which he says constitute prejudice. [10] (1996) 186 CLR 541, and in particular the oft quoted observations of McHugh J regarding the policy behind the enactment of limitation periods. 30 Mr Makowski referred m…
-
Protec Pacific Pty Ltd v Steuler Industriewerke GmbH
[2007] VSC 93
Citation 4
…rmining whether to extend the time for service of a writ.[4] [3] [1989] VR 1 [4] Followed in Protec Pacific Pty Ltd v Steuler Industriewerke GmbH [2007] VSC 93, per Hansen J 18 In Savcor Pty Ltd ,[5] Gillard AJA reviewed a number of authorities and then observed that those authorities established the following g…