Matthew Hanney and Belinda Smiley v

Link copied
Case Copied 20 min read

Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Matthew Hanney and Belinda Smiley v ; Lachlan McCabe and Amanda Toshack [2014] NSWCATCD 239
Hearing dates:1 August 2014 and 24 September 2014
Decision date: 09 December 2014
Jurisdiction:Consumer and Commercial Division
Before: G A Kinsey, General Member
Decision:

Application RT 14/28415

The landlords Lachlan McCabe and Amanda Toshack are to pay the sum of $2,195.00 to the tenants Matthew Hanney and Belinda Smiley on or before 19 December 2014

Application RT14/37816

The landlords Lachlan McCabe and Amanda Toshack are to pay the sum of $777.99 to the tenants Matthew Hanney and Belinda Smiley on or before 19 December 2014
Note: The net result is that the landlords are to pay the tenants the sum of $2,972.99 in respect of both applications
Legislation Cited: Residential Tenancies Act 2010
Residential Tenancies Regulation 2010
Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2010
Cases Cited: Northern Sandblasting Pty Ltd v Harris (1997) 188CLR 313
Jones v Bartlett (2000) HCA56; (2000) 205 CLR 166
Partridge v Maidi Pty Ltd (Tenancy) [2013] NSW CTTT 390
Shrestha v Crandell Pty Ltd [2010] NSW CTTT 240
De Chazol v Scala [2010] NSW CTTT 135
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Matthew Hanney and Belinda Smiley (tenants)
Lachlan McCabe and Amanda Toshack (landlords)
File Number(s):RT 14/28415 and RT 14/37816
Publication restriction:Unrestricted

reasons for decision

Application RT 14/28415

  1. On 29 May 2014 the applicants filed an application against the respondents in which they sought the following orders under the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (“the RTA”):

  1. An order under section 45 reducing the rent payable where the premises are uninhabitable;

  2. An order under section 65(1)(a) that the landlord carry out repairs;

  3. An order under section 65(1)(b) that the landlord reimburse the tenant for repairs;

  4. An order under section 109 that they were entitled to give immediate notice to vacate on the grounds that the premises were uninhabitable and to terminate the tenancy;

  5. An order under section 187(1)(o) for compensation.

I will refer to this application RT 14/28415 as “the First Application”.

  1. The applicants claimed on the First Application that they were entitled to compensation of $10,000.00.

Application RT 14/37816

  1. In an application filed in the Tribunal on 24 July 2014 the applicants claimed an amount of $1,660.67 from the rental bond. I will refer to this application RT 14/37816 as “the Second Application”.

Jurisdiction

  1. The dispute involved a residential tenancy agreement entered into by the parties on 19 November 2013.

  2. The premises are “residential premises” within the meaning of section 3 of the RTA. The Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear and determine the application.

Background

  1. The parties entered into the standard form residential tenancy agreement on 19 November 2013 for premises at XXX Virginius Street, Padstow (“the Agreement’).

  2. The tenancy was for a period of 6 months commencing on 19 November 2013 and ending on 20 May 2014. The rent was $535.00 per week.

  3. An ingoing inspection was carried out on 18 November 2013. The tenants made various…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Matthew Hanney and Belinda Smiley v and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2014] NSWCATCD 239
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved landlords, Lachlan McCabe and Amanda Toshack, who were sued by their tenants, Matthew Hanney and Belinda Smiley, in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal. The tenants sought compensation for various breaches of their tenancy agreement, including failure to provide a safe and habitable living environment. The landlords contested the claims, arguing that they had fulfilled their obligations under the tenancy agreement.

The central legal issues that the tribunal had to resolve were whether the landlords had breached the tenancy agreement by failing to provide a safe and habitable living environment and, if so, what compensation was owed to the tenants. The tribunal considered whether the landlords had acted reasonably and diligently in maintaining the property and addressing the tenants' complaints.

The tribunal found that the landlords had indeed breached the tenancy agreement by failing to provide a safe and habitable living environment. They were found to have been negligent in addressing the tenants' complaints about various issues, including mould and pest infestations. The tribunal concluded that the landlords had not acted reasonably and diligently in maintaining the property, leading to the breaches. As a result, the tribunal ordered the landlords to pay the tenants $2,972.99 in total compensation for the breaches. The landlords were required to make these payments by 19 December 2014.

Orders

Orders of the court

Application RT 14/28415

The landlords Lachlan McCabe and Amanda Toshack are to pay the sum of $2,195.00 to the tenants Matthew Hanney and Belinda Smiley on or before 19 December 2014

Application RT14/37816

The landlords Lachlan McCabe and Amanda Toshack are to pay the sum of $777.99 to the tenants Matthew Hanney and Belinda Smiley on or before 19 December 2014

Note: The net result is that the landlords are to pay the tenants the sum of $2,972.99 in respect of both applications

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.