Matrimonial Causes Act 1965 (Cth)
An
Act to amend the
[Assented to 13 December, 1965]
BE it enacted by the Queen’s Most Excellent Majesty, the Senate, and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia, as follows:—
(2.) The
(3.) The Principal Act, as amended by this Act,
may be cited as the
“6a.—(1.) Subject
to this section, a union in the nature of marriage entered into outside
Australia or under Division 3 of Part IV. of the
“(2.) This section does not apply to a union unless the law applicable to local marriages that was in force in the country, or each of the countries, of domicile of the parties at the time the union took place permitted polygamy on the part of the male party.
“(3.) This section does not apply to a union where, at the time the union took place, either of the parties was a party to a subsisting polygamous or potentially polygamous union, but this section does apply to a union notwithstanding that the male party has, during the subsistence of the union, contracted, or purported to contract, a further union in the nature of marriage, whether or not the further union still subsists.”.
(
a )by omitting from sub-section (4.) the words “a marriage is dissolved or annulled by a decree under this Act” and inserting in their stead the words “a decree of dissolution of a marriage or nullity of a voidable marriage made under this Act becomes absolute or a decree of nullity of a void marriage is made under this Act”; and(
b )by inserting after sub-section (4.) the following sub-section:—“(4a.) The last preceding sub-section does not—
(
a )affect the jurisdiction of a court to make an order in respect of the maintenance of a child of the marriage against a person other than a party to the marriage; or(
b )cause such an order to cease to have effect.”.
“8a.—(1.) A court shall not make an order under Part VIII. for the maintenance, custody or guardianship of a child who is, under the law of a State, a ward of the State or a State child or a child who has a similar status under a law of a Territory of the Commonwealth.
“(2.) Nothing in this Act, and no order under this Act, affects—
(
a ) the jurisdiction of a court, or the power of an authority, under a law of a State to make an order, or take any other action, whereby a child becomes a ward of the State or a State child, or any similar jurisdiction or power under a law of a Territory of the Commonwealth;(
b ) any such order made, or action taken, or the operation, in respect of a child in relation to whom any such order has been made or action taken, of the law under which the order was made or action taken;(
c ) the jurisdiction of a court under a law of a State or Territory of the Commonwealth to make an order in respect of the maintenance of a child referred to in the last preceding sub-section in favour of an officer or authority of the State or Territory performing functions in relation to the welfare of children; or(d)an order of a kind referred to in the last preceding paragraph made by a court.”.
“(2.) Paragraph (
(
a ) a marriage solemnized under theMarriage (Overseas )Act 1955, or that Act as amended, including a marriage to which section twenty-four of that Act applied, or solemnized under Part V. of theMarriage Act 1961; or(
b )any other marriage recognized in Australia by virtue of theMarriage Act 1961 or regulations made under that Act.”.
“39. A decree of dissolution of marriage shall
not be made upon a ground specified in any of paragraphs (
(
a )the petitioner has condoned the ground and the ground has not been revived; or(
b )the petitioner has connived at the ground.
“39a. For the purposes of any provision of this Part referring to condonation, any presumption of condonation that arises from the continuance or resumption of sexual intercourse may be rebutted on the part of a husband, as well as on the part of a wife, by evidence sufficient to negative intent to condone.”.
“41a.—(1.) For the purposes of section thirty-nine of this Act, a ground shall not be deemed to have been condoned, and, for the purposes of sub-section (3.) of section thirty-seven of this Act and of section forty-one of this Act, adultery of the petitioner shall not be deemed to have been condoned, by reason only of a continuation or resumption of cohabitation between the parties
(whether with or without acts of sexual intercourse between them) for one period not exceeding three months if the court is satisfied that—
(
a ) the cohabitation was continued or resumed, as the case may be, with a view, on the part of the party to whom condonation might otherwise be attributed, to effecting a reconciliation; and(
b ) a reconciliation was not effected during that period.
“(2.) For the purposes of proceedings on the
ground specified in paragraph (
(
a ) before the desertion had continued for two years, the parties, on one occasion, resumed cohabitation (whether with or without acts of sexual intercourse between them), but the deserting party, within a period of three months after the resumption of cohabitation, again, without just cause or excuse, wilfully deserted the other party; and(
b ) the court is satisfied that—(i) the resumption of cohabitation was with a view, on the part of the deserted party, to effecting a reconciliation; and
(ii) a reconciliation was not effected during the period of cohabitation,
the periods of desertion before and after the period of cohabitation may be aggregated as if they were one continuous period, but the period of cohabitation shall not be deemed to be part of the period of desertion.
“(3.) For the purposes of proceedings on the
ground specified in paragraph (
(
a ) since the separation, the parties, on one occasion, resumed cohabitation (whether with or without acts of sexual intercourse between them), but, within a period of three months after the resumption of cohabitation, they again separated and thereafter lived separately and apart up to the date of the petition; and(
b ) the court is satisfied that—(i) the resumption of cohabitation was with a view, on the part of either party, to effecting a reconciliation; and
(ii) a reconciliation was not effected during the period of cohabitation,
the periods of living separately and apart before and after the period of cohabitation may be aggregated as if they were one continuous period, but the period of cohabitation shall not be deemed to be part of the period of living separately and apart.
“(4.) For the purposes of the preceding provisions of this section, a period of cohabitation shall be deemed to have continued during any interruption of the cohabitation that, in the opinion of the court, was not substantial.
“(5.) The operation of this section extends to things that occurred before the commencement of this section.”.
“(2a.) The last preceding sub-section does not derogate from any jurisdiction of a court under a law of a State or Territory of the Commonwealth to make orders affecting the rights of persons in respect of property as to which a person dies intestate.”.
(2.) The operation of the amendment made by the last preceding sub-section extends to decrees made, and property of persons who died, before the commencement of this Act.
“(1.) A decree
(
a ) that there are no children of the marriage in relation to whom this section applies; or(
b )that the only children of the marriage in relation to whom this section applies are the children specified in the order and that—(i) proper arrangements in all the circumstances have been made for the welfare of those children; or
(ii) there are special circumstances by reason of which the decree
nisi should become absolute notwithstanding that the court is not satisfied that such arrangements have been made.
“(1a.) For the purposes of the last preceding sub-section, the court shall, where the circumstances make it appropriate to do so, treat the welfare of a child as including its advancement and education.”.
(2.) Subject to the next succeeding sub-section,
section 71 of the Principal Act continues to apply in relation to a decree
(3.) In relation to a decree
(
a ) by omitting from sub-section (1.) the words “where the last preceding section applies in relation to a decreenisi, the decreenisi ” and inserting in their stead the words “a decreenisi made on or after the date of commencement of theMatrimonial Causes Act 1965”;(
b ) by omitting sub-section (2.);(
c ) by omitting from paragraph (b )of sub-section (4.) the words “sub-section (1.) or (2.) of this section” and inserting in their stead the words “sub-section (1.) of this section”;(
d ) by omitting from paragraph (a ) of sub-section (6.) the words “an appeal, application for leave to appeal or intervention, against or arising out of—” and inserting in their stead the words “an appeal or application for leave to appeal against, or an intervention or application for leave to intervene relating to—”; and(
e )by adding at the end thereof the following sub-section:—“(7.) For the purposes of this section, where an application for leave to appeal or to intervene, or for a re-hearing, is granted, the application shall be deemed not to have been determined or discontinued so long as—
(
a )the leave granted remains capable of being exercised; or(
b )an appeal, intervention or re-hearing instituted in pursuance of the leave is pending.”.
(2.) Section 72 of the Principal Act continues to
apply in relation to a decree
“(1.) Where—
(
a )an order under this Part has directed a person to execute a deed or instrument; and(
b )that person has refused or neglected to comply with the direction or, for any other reason, the court thinks it necessary to exercise the powers of the court under this sub-section,
the court may appoint an officer of the court or other person to execute the deed or instrument in the name of the person to whom the direction was given and to do all acts and things necessary to give validity and operation to the deed or instrument.”.
“101.—(1.) In any proceedings under this Act, evidence that a party to a marriage has been convicted, whether in Australia or elsewhere, of a crime is evidence that the party did the acts or things constituting the crime.
“(2.) In proceedings under this Act, a certificate of the conviction of a person of a crime by a federal court, a court of a State or Territory of the Commonwealth or a court of any part of the Commonwealth of Nations, being a certificate purporting to be signed by the Registrar or other proper officer of that court, is evidence of the fact of the conviction and of any particulars of the crime or of the conviction, including the date on which the crime was committed, and of any sentence of imprisonment imposed, that are included in the certificate.”.
(
a ) by inserting after paragraph (e ) the following paragraph:—
“ (ea )providing for the manner of service of process of a court under this Act, and for dispensing with such service;”; and(
b
0
0
0