Mater Misericordiae Limited T/A Mater

Case

[2024] FWC 2256

23 AUGUST 2024


[2024] FWC 2256

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.120 - Application to vary redundancy pay for other employment or incapacity to pay

Mater Misericordiae Limited T/A Mater

(C2024/5175)

COMMISSIONER DURHAM

BRISBANE, 23 AUGUST 2024

Variation of redundancy pay

  1. This decision concerns an application by Mater Misericordiae Limited T/A Mater (the Applicant) under section 120 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) to vary the redundancy pay owing to an employee, Mr Trevor Fleming (the Respondent).

  1. The Respondent has been employed by the Applicant for approximately 15 years and 6 months, entitling him to $26,893.42 in redundancy payment.

  1. The Applicant submitted that the Respondent had been offered a suitable alternative position, being a permanent position that is classified higher than his current substantive position under the applicable Enterprise Agreement. The Applicant therefore submits the Respondent will not experience any reduction to their current wage or terms and condition of employment. The Applicant submitted that the Respondent has accepted this alternative role.

  1. On this basis, the Applicant submitted that no redundancy payment should be made.

  1. The Commission served the application on the Respondent on 1 August 2024 as follows:

“Dear parties,

I refer to the above matter and advise Commissioner Durham has carriage. All further correspondence directed to the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) in respect of this matter is to be sent to Commissioner Durham’s Chambers via [email protected], copying in the other parties to this matter.

The Commissioner seeks the Respondent’s (Mr Fleming) views on whether they object to the application (attached), by close of business Friday, 2 August 2024.

If the Respondent does not object to the application, then the Commissioner proposes the matter be dealt with on the papers, subject to any objections to proceeding in this manner from the parties.”

  1. The Respondent did not respond. The Commission sent a further email to the Respondent on 5 August 2024 as follows:

“Dear Mr Fleming,

Reference is made to the above matter and previous email below.

Chambers notes that no response has been received from you regarding the application.

Please advise by close of business today.”

  1. The Respondent also did not respond.

  1. Chambers contacted the Respondent by telephone on 6 August 2024 in relation to the previous emails sent to the Respondent. The Respondent confirmed receipt of the emails, that he did not object to the Application, and was agreeable to proceeding as the Commission had proposed.

  1. In all of the circumstances I am satisfied that it is appropriate to exercise power to reduce the redundancy amount.

  1. I have determined that the redundancy payment should be reduced to an amount of $0. An Order to that effect is issued in conjunction with this decision.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR778561>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0