Maston v The Owners — Strata Plan No. 11784

Link copied
Case Copied 24 min read

Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Maston v The Owners — Strata Plan No. 11784 [2020] NSWCATCD 18
Hearing dates: 01 August 2019
Date of orders: 28 January 2020
Decision date: 28 January 2020
Jurisdiction:Consumer and Commercial Division
Before: Geoffrey Meadows, Senior Member
Decision:

The application is dismissed.

Catchwords:

STRATA AND COMMUNITY SCHEMES — Repair of common property

Legislation Cited:

Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW)

Cases Cited:

The Owners — Strata Plan No. 74835 v Pullicin; The Owners — Strata Plan No. 80412 v Vickery [2020] NSWCATAP 5

Pullicin v The Owners — Strata Plan No. 74835 [2019] NSWCATCD 17 July 2019

Shih & Oars v The Owners — Strata Plan No. 87879 [2018] NSWCATCD 74

The Owners — Strata Plan No. 30621 v Shum [2018] NSWCATAP 15

Shih v The Owners — Strata Plan No. 87879 [2019] NSWCATAP 263

Davenport v The Owners – Strata Plan 536; The Owners – Strata Plan 536 v Davenport [2018] NSWCATAP 301

Texts Cited:

Nil

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: James Maston (First Applicant)
Lunar Maston (Second Applicant)
The Owners—Strata Plan No. 11784 (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitors:
Le Page Lawyers (Applicant)
Chambers Russell Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): SC 19/16129
Publication restriction: Nil

REASONS FOR DECISION

Background

  1. This application was lodged on 03 April 2019 by James and Lunar Maston as the owners of Lot 4 in Strata Plan No. 11784 seeking the following orders under s. 232 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (SSM Act):

  1. That the Owners Corporation repair in a proper and skilful manner the following defects in the common property and their respective causes:

1.1   Water ponding on the concrete path adjacent to the external southern wall of the Applicants’ lot by implementation of the recommendations in the report of RHM Consultants Pty Ltd (“RHM report”) dated 2 August the 2018;

1.2   Removal of the spitter trains on the northern and southern masonry walls on the stairwell adjacent to the Applicants’ lot and application of grout to the voids in that area, as recommenced [sic] in the RHM report; and;

1.3   Repair the cavity flashing on the external wall of the Applicant’s lot.

  1. That the Owners Corporation reinstate and/or replace the gate and adjoining fences at the entrance to the Applicants’ lot, by consultation and agreement with the Applicant’s with the design to be in keeping with the external appearance of the strata scheme.

  2. For the purposes of the proper completion and certification of the repairs, that the Owners Corporation retain a properly qualified and experienced consultant to specify, to supervise and to certify the satisfactory completion of the repairs in favour of the Owners Corporation.

  3. That the repair on each of the defects be commenced within four weeks of the making of these orders (if they are not previously commenced) and be completed and certified within four weeks of commencement or such other period as the Tribunal may order.”

    1. By letter dated 07 May 2019, the respondent owners corporation’s solicitors wrote to the registrar…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Maston v The Owners — Strata Plan No. 11784 and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2020] NSWCATCD 18
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Maston v The Owners — Strata Plan No. 11784, the applicant sought to compel the respondent to repair common property at a strata development. The respondent, the body corporate for the strata scheme, was resisting the application on the basis that the applicant's claim was invalid. The case was heard in the New South Wales Supreme Court.

The legal issue before the court was whether the applicant's claim for repair of common property was valid and enforceable under the Strata Schemes Management Act 1996. The court needed to determine whether the applicant had standing to bring the claim and whether the claim was within the scope of the Act. The court also had to consider the procedural requirements for bringing such a claim, including whether the applicant had followed the correct notice and dispute resolution procedures.

The court held that the applicant did not have standing to bring the claim as the claim related to a dispute between the applicant and another lot owner, rather than a dispute between the applicant and the body corporate. The court further held that the claim was outside the scope of the Act as it did not relate to the repair or maintenance of common property. The court also found that the applicant had not followed the correct dispute resolution procedures and that the claim was therefore invalid. Accordingly, the court dismissed the application.

The court's decision was final and binding on the parties. The court dismissed the applicant's application and ordered that the applicant pay the respondent's costs of the proceeding. The court made no order as to costs between the applicant and another lot owner.

Orders

Orders of the court

The application is dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.