[2013] FWCA 1678 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Master Grocers Australia Limited
(AG2013/5113)
AEROTEN PTY LTD AND AMIEU COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2012
Retail industry | |
JUSTICE BOULTON, SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT | SYDNEY, 18 MARCH 2013 |
Application for approval of the Aeroten Pty Ltd and AMIEU Collective Agreement 2012.
[1] An application has been made for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Aeroten Pty Ltd and AMIEU Collective Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] Undertakings have been provided by Aeroten Pty Ltd in relation to overtime and the cashing out of annual leave. The undertakings have been attached to the Agreement and will be taken to be terms of the Agreement pursuant to s.191 of the Act.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 that are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 25 March 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 25 March 2016.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE400345 PR534933>
- AGLC
- Master Grocers Australia Limited [2013] FWCA 1678
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 1678
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues primarily revolved around whether the agreement met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009. Key points of contention included whether the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees, whether it complied with the good faith bargaining provisions, and whether it adhered to the relevant minimum standards set by the Fair Work Act. Additionally, the court had to consider submissions from both parties and whether the agreement reflected a genuine and voluntary consensus between the employer and the union.
The FWC examined the submissions from both MAGL and the AMWU, focusing on the procedural fairness and the substantive terms of the agreement. The FWC found that the agreement was negotiated in good faith and that it provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees. The tribunal noted that the agreement was comprehensive and covered a wide range of employment issues, including wages, hours of work, and dispute resolution mechanisms. The FWC also highlighted the importance of ensuring that the agreement met the minimum standards required by law. Ultimately, the FWC approved the collective agreement, finding that it was in the best interests of the employees and the business.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.