Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited

Case

[2000] NSWSC 120

6 March 2000

No judgment structure available for this case.

CITATION: Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [2000] NSWSC 120
CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law
FILE NUMBER(S): SC 20223 of 1995; 20592 of 1996
HEARING DATE(S): 6 March 2000
JUDGMENT DATE: 6 March 2000

PARTIES :


JOHN MARSDEN
(Plaintiff)

v

AMALGAMATED TELEVISION SERVICES PTY LIMITED
(Defendant)
JUDGMENT OF: Levine J
COUNSEL :

I Barker Q.C.
M R Hall
(Plaintiff)

R Stitt Q.C.
J S Wheelhouse
(Defendant)
SOLICITORS:

Phillips Fox
(Plaintiff)

Mallesons Stephen Jaques
(Defendant)
CATCHWORDS: On Public Interest Immunity claim by NSW Police Service re confidential exhibits A and B to affidavit of Deputy Commissioner Moroney sworn 3 March 2000 - T4456
DECISION: See paragraph 4 & 5

DLJT: 106
(Ex Tempore - Revised)
[2000] NSWSC 120

    THE SUPREME COURT
    OF NEW SOUTH WALES
    COMMON LAW DIVISION
    DEFAMATION LIST

No. 20223 of 1995
No. 20592 of 1996

JUSTICE DAVID LEVINE

MONDAY 6 MARCH 2000

    JOHN MARSDEN
    (Plaintiff)

    v

    AMALGAMATED TELEVISION SERVICES PTY LIMITED
    ACN 000 145 246
    (Defendant)

    JUDGMENT (On Public Interest Immunity claim by NSW Police Service re confidential exhibits A and B to affidavit of Deputy Commissioner Moroney sworn 3 March 2000 - T4456)

1    HIS HONOUR: A subpoena was issued by the solicitors for the plaintiff on 3 February 2000 directed to the proper officer of the New South Wales Police Service. 2    Documents caught by the subpoena, but in an edited version, were the subject of a ruling by me on 2 March 2000 (NSWSC 112: DLJT 105). 3    An application founded upon public interest immunity has been made on behalf of the Police Service and I have read an affidavit filed in court of Deputy Commissioner Moroney sworn on 3 March 2000, to which there are two confidential exhibits. I have read those confidential exhibits. 4    I uphold the claim for public interest immunity, as it rests in one of the accepted categories thereof. 5    Inspection of the documents is refused and the confidential exhibits to Mr Moroney's affidavit will forthwith be returned.
    ***********
Last Modified: 09/25/2000
Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0