Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Maroon v Central Coast Council [2016] NSWLEC 1514 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 15 August 2016 Date of orders: 01 November 2016 Decision date: 01 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O’Neill C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Christopher Maroon (Applicant)
Central Coast Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Mr C. Gough solicitor.(Applicant)
Ms S. Nevin solicitor (Respondent)
Storey & Gough (Applicant)
Sparke Helmore Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2016/158177
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders.
The appeal is upheld.
Development Application 47091/2015 for a residential flat building at 3 – 5 Lynn Avenue (being Lots 9 and 10 DP 38586) is approved subject to the conditions contained at Annexure "A".
…………….
Susan O’Neill
Commissioner
158177.16 - Annexure A (93.4 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Maroon v Central Coast Council [2016] NSWLEC 1514
- Case
- [2016] NSWLEC 1514
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court included whether the Council's decision was made in accordance with the applicable planning laws and whether there was an error in the assessment of the application. The court also considered whether the decision was unreasonable and whether there was a failure to consider relevant factors. The applicant argued that the Council had failed to properly assess the application and had not considered all relevant factors, particularly those related to environmental impacts.
The court found that the Council's decision was not made in accordance with the applicable planning laws. The decision-making process was flawed as the Council had failed to properly assess the application and had not considered all relevant factors. The court found that there was an error in the assessment of the application and that the decision was unreasonable. The court quashed the decision of the Council and remitted the matter back for reconsideration. The court emphasised the importance of a proper and thorough assessment of development applications to ensure that all relevant factors are considered.
The final orders of the court included the quashing of the Council's decision to refuse the development application and the remitting of the matter back to the Council for reconsideration. The court ordered that the Council must properly assess the application and consider all relevant factors, including those related to environmental impacts. The court also ordered that the Council must provide written reasons for its decision and that the applicant must be given an opportunity to respond to any new information or issues raised by the Council.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.