Mark Zhang v Randwick City Council

Link copied
Case Copied 6 min read

Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Mark Zhang v Randwick City Council [2022] NSWLEC 1120
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference 15 February 2021
Date of orders: 11 March 2022
Decision date: 11 March 2022
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Dickson C
Decision:

The Court orders that:

(1) The appeal is upheld.

(2) Development Application DA/625/2020 (as amended) for the demolition of existing structures and construction of a three-storey residential flat building comprising 6 apartments, basement level carparking, landscaping and associated works and landscaping at 29 Stanley Street, Randwick is determined by the granting of consent, subject to the conditions in Annexure A to these orders.

(3) The Applicant is to pay the Respondent’s costs thrown away in the amount of $4,400 pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

(4)The Applicant is to pay the Respondent’s costs thrown away, pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, agree in the amount of $12,500 within 28 days.

Catchwords:

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – demolition and construction of new boarding house – amended plans – agreement between the parties – orders.

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Mark Zhang (Applicant)
Randwick City Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
I Hemmings (Applicant)
M Astill (Respondent)

Solicitors:
Madison Marcus Law Firm (Applicant)
V McGrath, Randwick City Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2021/54299
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: The proceedings are an appeal pursuant to s 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) by the Applicant against the deemed refusal of Development Application No. DA/625/2020 by Randwick City Council (the Respondent). The development application, as amended, seeks consent for the demolition of existing structures, and construction of a three-storey residential flat building comprising six apartments, basement carparking for nine cars and landscaping and associated works. The development is proposed at 29 Stanley Street, Randwick (Lot 1 DP 304856).

  2. The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34(1) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the LEC Act) between the parties, which was held on 15 February 2022. I presided over the conciliation conference. Following the conciliation, agreement was reached between the parties. That decision is that the appeal is upheld, and the development application is approved, subject to the conditions of consent annexed to this judgment: pursuant to s 4.16(1) of the EPA Act.

  3. In exercising the functions of the consent authority on the appeal, the Court has the power to determine the development application pursuant to ss 4.15 and 4.16 of the EPA Act. The final orders in this appeal, outlined below, are made as a result of an agreement between the parties that was reached at a conciliation conference.

  4. As the presiding Commissioner, I am satisfied that the decision is one that the Court can make in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the LEC Act). I have formed this state of satisfaction for the following reasons:

  1. By reference to the development application form filed,…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Mark Zhang v Randwick City Council and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2022] NSWLEC 1120
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Mark Zhang has appealed the Randwick City Council's refusal to grant planning consent for a development application to demolish an existing structure and construct a three-storey residential flat building. The Court of Appeal has upheld Mr Zhang's appeal and determined that consent should be granted, subject to specified conditions. The Council's refusal was based on concerns about the proposed development's potential impact on the character of the local area and its proximity to neighbouring properties. Mr Zhang argued that the concerns were unfounded and that the proposed development was consistent with the local planning policies.

The Court of Appeal considered whether the Council's decision was unreasonable and whether the proposed development would have an unacceptable impact on the character of the local area. The Court found that the Council's concerns about the proposed development's impact on the local area's character were not well-founded and that the proposed development was consistent with the local planning policies. The Court also found that the proposed development's proximity to neighbouring properties would not have an unacceptable impact.

The Court of Appeal ordered that the appeal be upheld and that planning consent be granted for the proposed development, subject to specified conditions. The Court also ordered that Mr Zhang pay the Council's costs thrown away in the amount of $16,900. The Court found that the Council's refusal of planning consent was unreasonable and that Mr Zhang was entitled to have his development application approved. The Court also found that the proposed development was consistent with the local planning policies and would not have an unacceptable impact on the character of the local area or neighbouring properties.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Court orders that:

(1) The appeal is upheld.

(2) Development Application DA/625/2020 (as amended) for the demolition of existing structures and construction of a three-storey residential flat building comprising 6 apartments, basement level carparking, landscaping and associated works and landscaping at 29 Stanley Street, Randwick is determined by the granting of consent, subject to the conditions in Annexure A to these orders.

(3) The Applicant is to pay the Respondent’s costs thrown away in the amount of $4,400 pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

(4)The Applicant is to pay the Respondent’s costs thrown away, pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, agree in the amount of $12,500 within 28 days.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.