Maritime Union of Australia, The

Case [2014] FWCA 5028


[2014] FWCA 5028
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Maritime Union of Australia, The
(AG2014/6461)

MARITIME UNION OF AUSTRALIA CLERICAL STAFF ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013

Clerical industry

COMMISSIONER RIORDAN

SYDNEY, 28 JULY 2014

Application for approval of the Maritime Union of Australia Clerical Staff Enterprise Agreement 2013.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Maritime Union of Australia Clerical Staff Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by The Maritime Union of Australia (MUA) (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The MUA and the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU), each being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers each organisation.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 November 2016.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE409274  PR553559>

Details
AGLC
Maritime Union of Australia, The [2014] FWCA 5028
Case
[2014] FWCA 5028
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Fair Work Commission involved an application by the Maritime Union of Australia (MUA) for the approval of the Maritime Union of Australia Clerical Staff Enterprise Agreement 2013. The union sought to have the agreement recognised as a registered agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009. The dispute centred on the procedural fairness of the application process and the validity of the agreement itself. The Commission was tasked with determining whether the agreement met the legal requirements for registration and if the application process was conducted fairly.

The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement complied with the statutory requirements for registration and if the application process was conducted in a procedurally fair manner. The Commission had to assess whether the agreement met the criteria of being a genuine enterprise agreement, whether it was made in good faith, and if the application process was fair and transparent. The Commission also needed to consider if the agreement complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act and the relevant regulations.

In its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement and was made in good faith. The Commission held that the application process was procedurally fair, and the union had acted appropriately in seeking approval of the agreement. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement met all the statutory requirements for registration, and it was in the best interests of the employees. Consequently, the Commission approved the Maritime Union of Australia Clerical Staff Enterprise Agreement 2013 as a registered agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The Fair Work Commission ordered that the Maritime Union of Australia Clerical Staff Enterprise Agreement 2013 be approved and registered as a registered agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009. The decision was made on the basis that the agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement, made in good faith, and the application process was procedurally fair. The Commission's decision ensured that the agreement would provide the intended benefits to the employees and would be enforceable under the Fair Work Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.