Marino v Bello

Case

[2021] NSWDC 52

11 March 2021


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Marino v Bello [2021] NSWDC 52 [2021] NSWDC 52 11 March 2021

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The dispute in Marino v Bello involves a plaintiff who seeks to bring claims for malicious prosecution and abuse of process against two defendants. These claims are in relation to criminal proceedings that have yet to conclude. The plaintiff's application for an adjournment of the proceedings until the conclusion of the criminal proceedings was refused, as was the plaintiff's application for leave to amend his statement of claim. The court also dismissed the plaintiff's claims for malicious prosecution and abuse of process, along with his application to add additional defendants to the proceedings.

The primary legal issues for the court's consideration were whether the plaintiff should be granted an adjournment of the proceedings until the criminal proceedings concluded, whether leave to amend the statement of claim should be granted, and whether the plaintiff's claims for malicious prosecution and abuse of process should proceed. The court examined whether the plaintiff could bring proceedings for malicious prosecution before a successful outcome in the criminal proceedings, and whether abuse of process could be claimed against someone who did not initiate the process. The court also considered the plaintiff's application to add additional defendants to the proceedings.

The court found that the plaintiff's application for an adjournment and/or a stay of these proceedings until the conclusion of the criminal proceedings should be refused, as should the plaintiff's application for leave to amend the statement of claim. The court held that the plaintiff could not bring proceedings for malicious prosecution before a successful outcome in the criminal proceedings, and that a claim for abuse of process could not be brought against someone who did not initiate the process. The court also dismissed the plaintiff's application to add additional defendants to the proceedings, finding that there was no basis for doing so. The court ordered that the plaintiff pay the defendants' costs both of this application and of the proceedings.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Tort Law

Legal Concepts

  • Malicious Prosecution

  • Abuse of Process

  • Stay of Proceedings

  • Compensatory Damages

  • Jurisdiction

  • Res Judicata

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

8

Marino v Bello (No 3) [2022] NSWCA 181
Cases Cited

17

Statutory Material Cited

3