Marino (a pseudonym) v Bello (a pseudonym)
Case
•
[2022] NSWCA 73
•16 May 2022
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Marino (a pseudonym) v Bello (a pseudonym) [2022] NSWCA 73
[2022] NSWCA 73
16 May 2022
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of *Marino (a pseudonym) v Bello (a pseudonym)* concerned an appeal heard in the Court of Appeal of New South Wales. The dispute involved allegations of abuse of process, with the applicant seeking leave to appeal against decisions made by the primary court.
The central legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether a person who had instigated, though not formally commenced, legal proceedings could be held liable for the tort of abuse of process, and whether the primary court had erred in refusing leave to replead certain claims against the first and second respondents, potentially in breach of sections 56-59 of the *Civil Procedure Act 2005* (NSW).
The Court of Appeal granted an extension of time for the applicant to file and serve documents related to their appeal. Leave to appeal was granted concerning claims against the first and second respondents on specific grounds relating to the alleged abuse of process and a breach of procedural fairness in the refusal to grant leave to replead. However, the application for leave to appeal was otherwise dismissed, and the applicant was ordered to pay the costs of the third to fifth and sixth respondents.
The central legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether a person who had instigated, though not formally commenced, legal proceedings could be held liable for the tort of abuse of process, and whether the primary court had erred in refusing leave to replead certain claims against the first and second respondents, potentially in breach of sections 56-59 of the *Civil Procedure Act 2005* (NSW).
The Court of Appeal granted an extension of time for the applicant to file and serve documents related to their appeal. Leave to appeal was granted concerning claims against the first and second respondents on specific grounds relating to the alleged abuse of process and a breach of procedural fairness in the refusal to grant leave to replead. However, the application for leave to appeal was otherwise dismissed, and the applicant was ordered to pay the costs of the third to fifth and sixth respondents.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Negligence & Tort
Legal Concepts
-
Abuse of Process
-
Appeal
-
Breach
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
MT v SE [2023] SADC 129
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Marino v Bello (No 3)
[2022] NSWCA 181
Riva NSW Pty Ltd v The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy
[2023] NSWSC 896
Cases Cited
26
Statutory Material Cited
3
A v New South Wales
[2007] HCA 10
A v New South Wales
[2007] HCA 10
A v New South Wales
[2007] HCA 10