SUPREME COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
Case Title: | Marhaba v Chen |
Citation: | [2024] ACTSC 241 |
Hearing Date: | 5-9 June 2023 |
Decision Date: | 26 July 2024 |
Before: | McWilliam J |
Decision: | (1) Judgment is entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $155,524. (2) The defendants are to pay the plaintiff’s costs. (3) If any party seeks a variation to order 2 by notification to chambers within 7 days, order 2 is stayed until further order. |
Catchwords: | NEGLIGENCE – CAUSATION – DAMAGES – Motor vehicle accident – breach of duty admitted – extent of injury suffered –extent to which disabilities attributable to accident – where pre-existing back injury – where later spinal degeneration – whether plaintiff continued to experience physical and psychological sequelae from the accident – where credit of plaintiff in issue – extent of domestic assistance required – damages awarded in reduced amount to take account of pre-existing injury and degenerative condition |
Legislation Cited: | Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002 (ACT) ss 45(1), 99 |
Cases Cited: | Baxterv Insurance Australia Limited [2015] ACTSC 273 Berkeley Challenge Pty Ltd v Howarth[2013] NSWCA 370 Blundell v Leighton [2013] ACTCA 1 Dow v Elbarbary [2017] ACTSC 418 Franklins Ltd v Burns; Burns v Franklins Ltd [2005] NSWCA 54 Leighton v Blundell [2011] ACTSC 136 Lumley v Sainsbury [2017] ACTSC 40 Malec v J C Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638 MBP (SA) Pty Ltd v Gogic (1991) 171 CLR 657 Rendell v Todd [2012] ACTSC 68 Robinson v Ng [2014] ACTSC 227 Scuderi v Raskurasingham [2017] ACTSC 41 Shorey v PT Limited [2003] HCA 27; 77 ALJR 1104 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Brown [2006] NSWCA 220; 66 NSWLR 540 Tsueneaki v Stewart [2013] ACTCA 34 Wainwright v Lee [2013] ACTSC 191 Young v Rothin [2009] ACTSC 71 |
Parties: | Rouba Marhaba ( Plaintiff) Zheng Chen ( First Defendant) AAI Limited t/as GIO Insurance ( Second Defendant) |
Representation: | Counsel W Sharwood ( Plaintiff) K Rewell SC ( Defendants) |
| Solicitors Capital Lawyers ( Plaintiff) Moray & Agnew ( Defendants) | |
File Number: | SC 388 of 2020 |
McWILLIAM J:
1․On 16 June 2016, Ms Rouba Marhaba (the plaintiff) was involved in a car accident involving three vehicles. She has brought a claim in negligence against the owner of the car causing the accident, Mr Zheng Chen, and his third-party insurer (the defendants). A breach of duty of care has been admitted, but liability for the injuries claimed is in issue, as well as any quantum if liability is determined in the plaintiff’s favour. They are the two matters for resolution in this proceeding, with the defendants strenuously contesting the plaintiff’s credit as to whether she suffered any injury at all from the accident, and if so, the extent of that injury and any consequent disabilities sounding in damages in this proceeding.
The accident giving rise to the claim
2․On the day in question, the plaintiff, aged 46, was the driver of a Volkswagen multi-van. She was stopped at traffic lights…
Continue reading Marhaba v Chen
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Marhaba v Chen [2024] ACTSC 241
- Case
- [2024] ACTSC 241
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court had to address were whether Marhaba continued to experience physical and psychological effects from the accident, and the extent to which these effects could be attributed to the accident as opposed to the pre-existing conditions. Additionally, the court needed to determine the credibility of Marhaba's testimony regarding the impact of the accident on his life and the level of domestic assistance required.
The court found that Marhaba's credibility was questionable in some respects, but ultimately accepted his evidence regarding the ongoing physical and psychological effects of the accident. The court accepted that Marhaba had suffered from a pre-existing back injury and subsequent spinal degeneration, but concluded that the accident had exacerbated his condition. The court also accepted that Marhaba required ongoing domestic assistance, although it reduced the amount awarded to account for the pre-existing conditions. The court awarded Marhaba damages in the sum of $155,524, taking into account the pre-existing injury and degenerative condition.
The court ordered that the defendants were to pay the plaintiff's costs. Additionally, if any party sought a variation to the costs order, the order would be stayed until further order if notification was made to chambers within 7 days.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) Judgment is entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $155,524.
(2) The defendants are to pay the plaintiff’s costs.
(3) If any party seeks a variation to order 2 by notification to chambers within 7 days, order 2 is stayed until further order.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.