MARCIN
v
MARCIN
[2021] HCASL 158
P20/2020
This application for special leave to appeal from a judgment of the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia does not raise any issue of principle suitable for determination by this Court. Further, given the lengthy delays, the already remitted hearing, and the size of the asset pool, a grant of special leave to appeal would not be in the interests of justice. The application should be dismissed.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
P.A. Keane J.J. Edelman 12 August 2021
Continue reading Marcin v Marcin
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Marcin v Marcin [2021] HCASL 158
- Case
- [2021] HCASL 158
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved the assessment of whether the case raised any matters of principle suitable for determination by the High Court and whether granting special leave to appeal would be in the interests of justice. The court had to consider the delays in the proceedings, the remitted hearing, and the substantial size of the asset pool as part of its decision-making process.
The court concluded that the application did not present any issue of principle suitable for determination by the High Court. Furthermore, the extensive delays, the remitted hearing, and the significant size of the asset pool led the court to determine that granting special leave to appeal would not be in the interests of justice. Consequently, the application for special leave to appeal was dismissed, and it was directed that the Registrar should prepare, sign, and seal the order dismissing the application. This decision was made on August 12, 2021, by Keane and Edelman.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.