Marcia Drew v The Trustee for the Replay Browns Plains Trust

Case [2023] FWC 97


[2023] FWC 97

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Marcia Drew
v

The Trustee For The Replay Browns Plains Trust

(U2022/10832)

VICE PRESIDENT CATANZARITI

SYDNEY, 16 JANUARY 2023

Application for an unfair dismissal remedy.

  1. Marcia Drew (the applicant) was employed by The Trustee For The Replay Browns Plains Trust (the respondent) from the 31st of December 2020 until the 25th of October 2022.

  1. On the 11th of November 2022, the applicant made an application for a remedy for unfair dismissal under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

  1. A conciliation was scheduled to take place on the 8th of December 2022. The Applicant did not participate and was not able to be contacted.

  2. On the 14th of December 2022, correspondence was sent to the applicant and she was required to respond by the 21st of December 2022 to clarify whether she wished to continue their application against the respondent or not.

  3. On the 22nd of December 2022, further correspondence was sent to the applicant directing her to provide a response by 5:00pm on the 27th of December 2022. It was in this correspondence the applicant was advised her matter may be dismissed without any further notice, should no response be received.

  1. To date, the applicant has not responded to any of the correspondence that my Chambers has sent to this date.

  1. Section 587 of the Act provides:

587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.

(2) Despite paragraphs (1)(b) and (c), FWC must not dismiss an application under section 365 or 773 on the ground that the application:

(a) is frivolous or vexatious; or

(b) has no reasonable prospects of success.

(3) FWC may dismiss an application:

(a) on its own initiative; or

(b) on application.

  1. The words, “Without limiting when FWC may dismiss an application” at the commencement of s.587(1) of the Act, establish that the jurisdiction of the Commission to dismiss an application is not limited to the circumstances set out in s.587(1)(a), (b) and (c).

  1. In the circumstances I have decided to dismiss the application for want of prosecution pursuant to s.587(3)(a) of the Act.

  1. An order to that effect will issue with this decision.

VICE PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR749647>

Details
AGLC
Marcia Drew v The Trustee for the Replay Browns Plains Trust [2023] FWC 97
Case
[2023] FWC 97
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Marcia Drew was employed by The Trustee For The Replay Browns Plains Trust from 31 December 2020 until 25 October 2022. Ms Drew made an application for a remedy for unfair dismissal under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The application was not proceeded with because Ms Drew did not respond to correspondence sent by the Commission and did not participate in a scheduled conciliation. The Commission was required to determine whether the application should be dismissed for want of prosecution.
The Commission noted that s.587(1) of the Act provides that it may dismiss an application for a range of reasons including if it has no reasonable prospects of success. The Commission also noted that s.587(2) of the Act prevents the dismissal of an application on the ground that it is frivolous or vexatious or has no reasonable prospects of success if the application is made under s.365 or s.773. The Commission noted that the application in this matter was made under s.394 of the Act and so the prohibition in s.587(2) did not apply. The Commission noted that the words, “Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application”, at the commencement of s.587(1) of the Act, established that the jurisdiction of the Commission to dismiss an application is not limited to the circumstances set out in s.587(1)(a), (b) and (c). The Commission decided to dismiss the application for want of prosecution under s.587(3)(a) of the Act.
An order will issue with this decision.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.