| [2022] FWCA 1921 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Marand Precision Engineering Pty Ltd T/A Marand Precision Engineering
(AG2022/1672)
Marand Precision Engineering Employee Agreement 2021
| Manufacturing and associated industries | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT BEAUMONT | PERTH, 16 JUNE 2022 |
Application for approval of the Marand Precision Engineering Employee Agreement 2021
Marand Precision Engineering Pty Ltd T/A Marand Precision Engineering has made an application for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Marand Precision Engineering Employee Agreement 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made under s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Form F17 Employer’s declaration in support of an application for approval of an enterprise agreement, indicated that the Applicant had not provided employees with seven clear days’ notice of the time, place and method of vote as required by s 181(1) of the Act (see also ss 180(3) and 180(4)). In response, the Applicant submitted that the Form F17 had incorrectly stated that the date employees were provided with notice of the time, place, and method of voting was 16 May 2022, when in fact this had occurred on 12 May 2022. Evidence of correct date was provided, and I am therefore satisfied that the requirements of s 180(3) have been met.
It appeared that instead of providing access to, or giving a copy of, the incorporated modern award,[1] employees were to request a copy. The Applicant submitted that failing to provide the employees with a copy of the incorporated Award was a minor procedural error for the purposes of the s 188(2) of the Act. The Applicant, relying upon what was expressed by the Full Bench decision in Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v AKN Pty Ltd T/A Aitkin Crane Services (Aitkin),[2] and by the Commissioner in Mulgoa Quarries Pty Limited (Mulgoa),[3] submitted that the modern award was a publicly available document which was sufficient for it to demonstrate it was readily available to employees. The Applicant further submitted that the modern award and its predecessors had been incorporated into previous versions of the Agreement from 2003 until now. I am satisfied, having had regard to the Full Bench decision in Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Ltd T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others[4] and the decisions of Aitkin and Mulgoa, that the abovementioned error constituted a minor technical or procedural error for the purposes of s 188(2)(a) of the Act.[5] Further, I am satisfied that the employees were not likely to have been disadvantaged by the error.
On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declarations, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia and the Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (together, the organisations), being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s 183 of the Act they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s 201(2), and based on the declarations provided by the organisations, I note that the organisations are covered by the Agreement.
The Agreement was approved on 16 June 2022 and, in accordance with s 54, will operate from 23 June 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2024.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 180(2).
[2] [2020] FWCFB 3438.
[3] [2020] FWC 1063 [24] – [25].
[4] [2019] FWCFB 318.
[5] Mulgoa Quarries Pty Limited [2020] FWC 1063 [24] – [25].
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE516249 PR742585>
- AGLC
- Marand Precision Engineering Pty Ltd T/A Marand Precision Engineering [2022] FWCA 1921
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 1921
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement provided for the employees' rights and obligations in a fair and balanced manner and whether it complied with the mandatory provisions of the Fair Work Act. The Commission had to examine the agreement to ensure it did not undermine the rights of employees or the protections provided by the Act. Additionally, the Commission considered whether the agreement had been made in good faith and whether the requisite procedural requirements were met.
The Fair Work Commission found that the proposed agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The Commission noted that the agreement provided clear terms and conditions for employees, including provisions for wages, hours of work, leave entitlements, and dispute resolution mechanisms. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement did not undermine the rights of employees and that it had been made in good faith. The Commission also found that the necessary procedural requirements had been met, including the provision of the agreement to employees and the opportunity for employees to seek independent legal advice.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Marand Precision Engineering Employee Agreement 2021. The approval was based on the finding that the agreement met all statutory requirements and provided for the fair and balanced treatment of employees. The Commission's decision confirmed that the agreement was compliant with the Fair Work Act and could be implemented as a binding enterprise agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.