Maple and Niu and Anor (No.2)
Case
•
[2018] FCCA 26
•10 January 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Maple and Niu and Anor (No.2) [2018] FCCA 26
[2018] FCCA 26
10 January 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Maple and Niu and Anor (No.2)*, heard by Judge Terry, the applicant sought to recover costs from the first and second respondents following an appeal to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT). The specific nature of the dispute that led to the AAT appeal is not detailed in the provided text, but the proceedings before Judge Terry concerned the allocation of costs associated with that prior appeal.
The central legal issue before Judge Terry was the determination of the quantum of costs to be awarded to the first and second respondents, and the timeframe for payment by the applicant. The court was required to fix these costs and establish the conditions under which they should be discharged.
Judge Terry ordered that the applicant pay the first respondent's costs of and incidental to the AAT appeal, fixed at $6,948.00, to be paid within three months of the date of the orders. Similarly, the applicant was ordered to pay the second respondent's costs of and incidental to the AAT appeal, also fixed at $6,948.00, with payment due within three months of the date of these proceedings.
The central legal issue before Judge Terry was the determination of the quantum of costs to be awarded to the first and second respondents, and the timeframe for payment by the applicant. The court was required to fix these costs and establish the conditions under which they should be discharged.
Judge Terry ordered that the applicant pay the first respondent's costs of and incidental to the AAT appeal, fixed at $6,948.00, to be paid within three months of the date of the orders. Similarly, the applicant was ordered to pay the second respondent's costs of and incidental to the AAT appeal, also fixed at $6,948.00, with payment due within three months of the date of these proceedings.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Carrell v Mayne [2021] FedCFamC2G 162
Cases Citing This Decision
8
Hirst v Dalton
[2021] FCCA 1697
Hirst v Dalton
[2021] FCCA 1697
Hirst v Dalton
[2021] FCCA 1697
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
5
COUSINS & PEAKE (No.2)
[2017] FCCA 2431
Hughes v Western Australian Cricket Association (Inc)
[1986] FCA 382
Ritter v Godfrey
[1922] HCA 62