Maple and Niu and Anor (No.2)

Case

[2018] FCCA 26

10 January 2018


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Maple and Niu and Anor (No.2) [2018] FCCA 26 [2018] FCCA 26 10 January 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Maple and Niu and Anor (No.2)*, heard by Judge Terry, the applicant sought to recover costs from the first and second respondents following an appeal to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT). The specific nature of the dispute that led to the AAT appeal is not detailed in the provided text, but the proceedings before Judge Terry concerned the allocation of costs associated with that prior appeal.

The central legal issue before Judge Terry was the determination of the quantum of costs to be awarded to the first and second respondents, and the timeframe for payment by the applicant. The court was required to fix these costs and establish the conditions under which they should be discharged.

Judge Terry ordered that the applicant pay the first respondent's costs of and incidental to the AAT appeal, fixed at $6,948.00, to be paid within three months of the date of the orders. Similarly, the applicant was ordered to pay the second respondent's costs of and incidental to the AAT appeal, also fixed at $6,948.00, with payment due within three months of the date of these proceedings.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Costs

  • Appeal

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

8

Hirst v Dalton [2021] FCCA 1697
Hirst v Dalton [2021] FCCA 1697
Hirst v Dalton [2021] FCCA 1697
Cases Cited

4

Statutory Material Cited

5

COUSINS & PEAKE (No.2) [2017] FCCA 2431
Ritter v Godfrey [1922] HCA 62