Mankus and Matulis

Case [2016] FamCA 799


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

MANKUS & MATULIS [2016] FamCA 799
FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – Best interests of the children – Kenyan law with respect to parenting orders, enforcement of foreign judgements and institution of criminal proceedings – Benefit to the children having a meaningful relationship with both parents – The need to protect the children from physical or psychological harm – Practical difficulty or significant expense involved in spending time with and communicating with the other parent – Unacceptable risk that the children will not be returned to Australia if contact with the father occurs in Kenya – Hague Convention and Child Protection Convention do not apply.

FAMILY LAW – COURTS AND JUDGES – Disqualification – Apprehension of bias – Application dismissed – Expert evidence – Proof of foreign law – Enforcement of Australian orders in Kenya – obtaining “mirror orders”.

Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 174, 175
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), Div 12 of Part VII, ss 60B, 60CA, 60CC, 65DAA, 69ZT.

Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (1980)
Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-Operation in Respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children (1996)

Deiter & Deiter [2011] FamCAFC 82
Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; 205 CLR 337
G & C [2006] FamCA 994
M v M (1988) 166 CLR 69; [1988] HCA 68
Mankus & Matulis [2015] FamCA 217
Mazorski & Albright (2007) Fam LR 518
McCall & Clark (2009) FLC 93-405; (2009) 41 Fam LR 483; [2009] FamCAFC 92
Strahan & Strahan (Disqualification)[2009] FamCAFC 204

APPLICANT: Ms Mankus
RESPONDENT: Mr Matulis
INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Legal Aid NSW
FILE NUMBER: PAC 5648 of 2014
DATE DELIVERED: 9 September 2016
PLACE DELIVERED: Parramatta
PLACE HEARD: Parramatta
JUDGMENT OF: Hannam J
HEARING DATE: 1 June 2015, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 April 2016

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: Mr Schroder
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: Smythe Wozniak Solicitors
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: Mr Tocker
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: Owen Hodge Lawyers
COUNSEL FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Ms DeVere
SOLICITOR FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Legal Aid NSW

Orders

  1. The father shall spend time with the children B born … 2006, C born … 2009 and D born … 2009 (“the children”) in Australia, such time to include:

    (a)   The school holidays commencing at the end of Term 2 (mid-year) in each year and

    (b)  Two weeks in the school holidays commencing at the end of Term 4 (Christmas) commencing at 10am on 27 December 2016 and ending at 4pm on 10 January 2017 and each alternate year thereafter and commencing at 10am on 23 December 2017 and ending on 6 January 2018 and each alternate year hereafter.

  2. In the event that the father does not spend time with the children in the school holidays commencing at the end of Term 2 in any year, he shall spend time with the children in Australia for four weeks in the school holidays…

Continue reading Mankus and Matulis

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Mankus and Matulis [2016] FamCA 799
Case
[2016] FamCA 799
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter concerned orders made by Hannam J regarding the time spent by the father with his three children, B, C, and D, and related parental responsibilities. The dispute centred on the practical arrangements for the father's contact with the children, who reside in Australia, and the conditions attached to that contact.

The court was required to determine the specific periods the father would spend with the children, including during school holidays, and to establish a framework for communication and information sharing between the parents. Key issues included the duration and timing of the father's time with the children, the conditions under which this time would occur, and provisions for the children's welfare, such as their placement on the Airport Watch List and the surrender of passports. The court also addressed the parents' obligations regarding denigration, the children's cultural activities, and access to educational and medical information.

Hannam J's reasoning focused on establishing a workable and child-focused schedule for the father's time with the children, balancing the father's right to spend time with them against the need for stability and the children's safety. The orders stipulated specific holiday periods, including mid-year and Christmas holidays, with provisions for alternate arrangements if the primary schedule was not met. Conditions were imposed to ensure the children's security, such as the father surrendering his passports and the children remaining on the Airport Watch List. The court also mandated regular communication between the father and children, and established clear protocols for information exchange regarding the children's schooling and medical care, including direct correspondence rights for the father with schools and medical practitioners. Furthermore, restrictions were placed on the mother's ability to relocate the children's residence, and both parents were ordered to refrain from denigrating each other.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The father shall spend time with the children B born … 2006, C born … 2009 and D born … 2009 (“the children”) in Australia, such time to include:

(a) The school holidays commencing at the end of Term 2 (mid-year) in each year and

(b) Two weeks in the school holidays commencing at the end of Term 4 (Christmas) commencing at 10am on 27 December 2016 and ending at 4pm on 10 January 2017 and each alternate year thereafter and commencing at 10am on 23 December 2017 and ending on 6 January 2018 and each alternate year hereafter.

2.

In the event that the father does not spend time with the children in the school holidays commencing at the end of Term 2 in any year, he shall spend time with the children in Australia for four weeks in the school holidays commencing at the end of Term 4 (Christmas) commencing at 10am on 27 December and ending at 4pm on 24 January in even numbered years and commencing at 10am on 23 December and ending at 4pm on 20 January in odd numbered years.

3.

The father’s time pursuant to Order 1(a) shall commence at 10am on the first day the children are not required to attend school during such holiday and end at 4pm on the day prior to the children’s first day of attendance in the new school term.

4.

The father is to notify the mother by no later than thirty (30) days prior to the commencement of the second Term’s school holidays of his intention to exercise time with the children pursuant to Order 1 or 2.

5.

The father shall spend time with the children at such other times as may be agreed by the parties upon the father giving not less than 14 days’ notice of his intention to come to Australia.

6.

The father’s time with the children pursuant to these Orders is subject to the following conditions:

(a) His time with the children shall take place in Australia.

(b) The children shall remain on the Airport Watch List and the father shall do and say all things and sign all documents to ensure the children remain on the Airport Watch List if requested to do so by the mother.

(c) The father shall surrender to the mother all current passports in his name, including any Diplomatic Passports, prior to the commencement of his time with the children.

(d) Upon the return of the children to the mother by the father or his nominee at the end of the father’s time with the children pursuant to these orders, the mother shall forthwith return the passports surrendered by the father pursuant to Order 6(c).

7.

The mother shall facilitate regular telephone, text, email or other electronic communication between the children and the father.

8.

The mother shall initiate weekly Skype communication between the children and the father provided that the father keeps the mother informed of the relevant Skype address.

9.

The mother shall keep the father advised as to the following:

(a) The residential address of the children

(b) The name and address of the school attended by the children

(c) The name and address of the children’s Doctor

(d) The name and address of any medical specialist treating the children

(e) The mother’s telephone, email and Skype contact details

10.

These Orders shall be authority for the father to:

(a) Correspond directly with the children’s schools; and

(b) Obtain copies of their school reports, school photographs, newsletters and other relevant material; and

(c) Obtain any other information or correspondence whatsoever from the schools relating to the children.

11.

These Orders shall be authority for the father to correspond directly with any medical practitioner that the children might attend upon, including, but not limited to, General Practitioners, Counsellors, Psychologists and any other medical specialists to obtain information relating to the children’s treatment.

12.

Whilst the mother lives in Canberra, changeover shall take place at the Canberra Aquatic Centre.

13.

In the event that the mother relocates to another location in Australia, she shall advise the father as to an alternative changeover location.

14.

The mother is restrained from moving the children’s residential address to a place more than one hour driving time from any capital city in Australia.

15.

Each of the parties shall not denigrate the other party, members of the other party’s family or the other party’s partner, from time to time, and shall use their best endeavours to ensure that third parties do not denigrate such persons in the presence and hearing of the children.

16.

The mother shall use her best endeavours to ensure that the children participate regularly in culturally appropriate activities including speaking their native tongue.

17.

The mother shall follow all reasonable directions of the children’s general practitioners or treating professionals particularly in relation to counselling or other therapy as recommended by Dr Lucia V and shall keep the father advised as to the children’s treatment, including providing copies of available reports to him electronically.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.