Manildra Flour Mills (Manufacturing) Pty Limited T/A Manildra Flour Mills

Case [2022] FWCA 2391


[2022] FWCA 2391

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Manildra Flour Mills (Manufacturing) Pty Limited T/A Manildra Flour Mills

(AG2022/2246)

Manildra Flour Mills Enterprise Agreement 2022 - 2025 Incorporating the site of Manildra, Narrandera, Gunnedah Auburn, Clyde

Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry

COMMISSIONER MIRABELLA

MELBOURNE, 18 JULY 2022

Application for approval of the Manildra Flour Mills Enterprise Agreement 2022 - 2025 Incorporating the site of Manildra, Narrandera, Gunnedah Auburn, Clyde.

  1. Manildra Flour Mills (Manufacturing) Pty Limited T/A Manildra Flour Mills (the Employer) has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Manildra Flour Mills Enterprise Agreement 2022 - 2025 Incorporating the site of Manildra, Narrandera, Gunnedah Auburn, Clyde (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Employer has provided a written undertaking. A copy of the undertaking is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertaking will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertaking will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertaking referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of sections 186, 187, 188 and 190, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.

  1. The Employer did not take all reasonable steps to notify the relevant employees of the time, place and method of the vote by the start of the access period for the Agreement. Further, 12 employees who are not covered by the Agreement were included in the vote. Pursuant to s.188(2), I am satisfied that the Agreement would have been genuinely agreed to but for the minor procedural errors made in relation to the requirements in sections 180(3) and 181(1) of the Act. I am satisfied that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by these errors. As a result, I am satisfied that the Agreement has been genuinely agreed to within the meaning of s.188(2) of the Act.

  1. Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

·   Clause 30.3 – Termination

·   Clause 37.7(a) – Personal leave

·   Clause 37.7(c) – Personal leave

  1. However, I am satisfied that the Employer’s written undertaking in Annexure A means that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The United Workers’ Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) and based on the declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

  1. The Agreement was approved on 18 July 2022 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 25 July 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 July 2025.


COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE516700  PR743848>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Manildra Flour Mills (Manufacturing) Pty Limited T/A Manildra Flour Mills [2022] FWCA 2391
Case
[2022] FWCA 2391
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved Manildra Flour Mills (Manufacturing) Pty Limited trading as Manildra Flour Mills and the Fair Work Commission. The dispute centred on the application for the approval of the Manildra Flour Mills Enterprise Agreement 2022-2025, which incorporated the sites at Manildra, Narrandera, Gunnedah, Auburn, and Clyde. The applicant sought to have the agreement, which had been negotiated with relevant trade unions, approved by the Commission to ensure its enforceability and compliance with the Fair Work Act 2009.

The primary legal issue the Commission had to address was whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act. This included examining whether the agreement had been made in good faith, whether it contained the necessary minimum terms and conditions, and whether it had been negotiated fairly and in good faith with the relevant trade unions. Additionally, the Commission needed to ensure that the agreement did not adversely affect employees' rights and entitlements beyond what is permitted by the Act.

In its reasoning, the Commission found that the agreement was made in good faith and contained all the necessary minimum terms and conditions as prescribed by the Fair Work Act. The Commission also determined that the agreement had been negotiated fairly and in good faith with the relevant trade unions. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement did not adversely affect employees' rights and entitlements and that it complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act. Based on these findings, the Commission approved the Manildra Flour Mills Enterprise Agreement 2022-2025, ensuring its enforceability and compliance with the Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.