| [2022] FWCA 4352 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2022/5007)
Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd Pluto Train 2 Project Agreement
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT DEAN | CANBERRA, 13 DECEMBER 2022 |
Application for approval of the Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd Pluto Train 2 Project Agreement.
An application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement known as the Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd Pluto Train 2 Project Agreement (the Agreement). The application was made by the Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd (Employer) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of section 172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU), the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU), the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) and the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU) are entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
The Employer has provided written undertakings and a copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. In accordance with s.191(1) of the Act, the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
The Agreement does not contain a flexibility term and does not contain a consultation term which meets the requirements of s.205(1A) of the Act. Pursuant to s.202(4) and s.205(2) of the Act, the model flexibility and consultation terms prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 are taken to be terms of the Agreement.
Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note the Agreement was made with the AMWU, AWU, CEPU and CFMMEU and that the Agreement covers these organisations.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 20 December 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 12 December 2026.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE518513 PR748785>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 4352
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 4352
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered whether the agreement provided sufficient detail regarding the services to be performed, including the specifications for the heavy equipment to be transported and the standards for the performance of those services. The court also examined the penalties outlined in the agreement for non-compliance with the quality standards. After reviewing the evidence and submissions, the court concluded that the agreement sufficiently met the requirements of the National Transport Commission (Performance Reporting) Determination 2014. The court found that the agreement provided adequate detail regarding the services, quality standards, and penalties for non-compliance, and therefore approved the agreement.
The Federal Court granted the application for approval of the Pluto Train 2 Project Agreement. The court determined that the agreement complied with the necessary provisions of the National Transport Commission (Performance Reporting) Determination 2014 and provided sufficient detail regarding the services, quality standards, and penalties for non-compliance. This decision allowed Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd to proceed with the transportation of heavy equipment for the Santos GLNG project. The court's approval was essential for the project to move forward, ensuring that the services provided met the required standards and that there were consequences for non-compliance.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.