Mallard & Mallard
Case
•
[2011] FamCA 876
•16 November 2011
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Mallard & Mallard [2011] FamCA 876
[2011] FamCA 876
16 November 2011
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Mallard & Mallard*, the wife, Ms Mallard, sought leave to reopen her case to pursue spousal maintenance orders. The husband, Mr Mallard, was the respondent. The proceedings were before Fowler J.
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the wife should be granted leave to reopen her case for spousal maintenance, and the division of property between the parties.
Fowler J dismissed the wife's application for leave to reopen her case for spousal maintenance. The court declared the wife the sole legal and beneficial owner of the M Town property. The husband was ordered to pay the wife $150,000, with $100,000 payable within 21 days and the balance in monthly instalments. The wife was also awarded absolute ownership of household contents, livestock, horse accessories, farm machinery and equipment at M Town, and her superannuation entitlements. The wife was ordered to transfer her interest in the C Town property to the husband. The husband was entitled to absolute ownership of various other properties in C Town, household contents, plant, machinery, equipment, livestock, horse accessories, his superannuation, and shares in I Pty Ltd and J Pty Ltd. The husband was also ordered to indemnify the wife against any claims by J Pty Ltd or the Taxation Department concerning company loans in her name. Otherwise, each party was to retain their own property.
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the wife should be granted leave to reopen her case for spousal maintenance, and the division of property between the parties.
Fowler J dismissed the wife's application for leave to reopen her case for spousal maintenance. The court declared the wife the sole legal and beneficial owner of the M Town property. The husband was ordered to pay the wife $150,000, with $100,000 payable within 21 days and the balance in monthly instalments. The wife was also awarded absolute ownership of household contents, livestock, horse accessories, farm machinery and equipment at M Town, and her superannuation entitlements. The wife was ordered to transfer her interest in the C Town property to the husband. The husband was entitled to absolute ownership of various other properties in C Town, household contents, plant, machinery, equipment, livestock, horse accessories, his superannuation, and shares in I Pty Ltd and J Pty Ltd. The husband was also ordered to indemnify the wife against any claims by J Pty Ltd or the Taxation Department concerning company loans in her name. Otherwise, each party was to retain their own property.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Property Law
-
Equity & Trusts
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Remedies
-
Costs
-
Fiduciary Duty
-
Constructive Trust
-
Injunction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Mallard & Mallard [2011] FamCA 876
Most Recent Citation
Warnick & Warnick [2024] FedCFamC2F 749
Cases Citing This Decision
12
Barrett & Winnie
[2021] FamCA 625
Chisler and Gatenby
[2019] FamCA 200
Theodore & Theodore
[2017] FamCA 588
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
1
Stephens & Stephens & Anor (Enforcement)
[2009] FamCAFC 240
R v Lawrence
[2001] QCA 441
D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid
[2005] HCA 12