Malik (Migration)

Case

[2018] AATA 1940

7 May 2018


Malik (Migration) [2018] AATA 1940 (7 May 2018)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mr Waqas Malik

CASE NUMBER:  1800012

DIBP REFERENCE(S):  BCC2017/3580009

MEMBER:M. Edgoose

DATE:7 May 2018

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne, Victoria

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 visa:

·cl.500.215 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations

Statement made on 07 May 2018 at 9:46am

CATCHWORDS
Migration – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – Subclass 500 (Student) – Evidence of health insurance – Decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, s 65
Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2 cl 500.215

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration to refuse to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). The applicant applied for the visa on 30 September 2017. The delegate refused to grant the visa on 14 December 2017.

  2. The delegate made the decision on the basis that evidence of adequate health insurance was not provided as required to satisfy a criterion for the grant of the visa under the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations).

  3. The applicant has since provided the Tribunal with documentation evidencing that he now has adequate health insurance (AAT folio 38). In light of the new evidence received, the Tribunal is satisfied that the criterion is met and has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

    DECISION

  4. The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 visa:

    ·cl.500.215 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations

    M. Edgoose
    Member


Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

  • Remedies

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Judicial Review

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0