Malhi (Migration)

[2020] AATA 1182

Malhi (Migration) [2020] AATA 1182 (17 April 2020)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANTS:  Mr Parminder Jeet Singh Malhi
Mrs Pardeep Kaur Pardeep Kaur
Ms Emanpreet Kaur Malhi

CASE NUMBER:  1828698

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2017/339422

MEMBER:Phoebe Dunn

DATE:17 April 2020

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN) visas for reconsideration, with the direction that the first named applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) visa:

·cl.187.233(3) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

.

Statement made on 17 April 2020 at 11:49am

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN) visa – Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) – Direct Entry stream – Motor Mechanic – subject of an approved nomination – decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 65
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Schedule 2, cl 187.233

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs to refuse to grant the applicants Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN) visas under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

2. The applicants applied for the visas on 25 January 2017. At the time of application, Class RN contained one subclass: Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme).

3. The criteria for a Subclass 187 visa are set out in Part 187 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations). The primary criteria must be satisfied by at least one applicant. Other members of the family unit, if any, who are applicants for the visa need satisfy only the secondary criteria. Applicants seeking to satisfy the primary criteria must meet the 'Common criteria', as well as the criteria of one of two alternative visa streams: the Temporary Residence Transition stream, or the Direct Entry stream.

4. In the present case, the first named applicant (the applicant) is seeking the visa in the Direct Entry stream, to work in the nominated position of Motor Mechanic (ANZSCO 321211).

5. The delegate refused to grant the visas because the applicant did not meet cl.187.233(3) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations because the related nomination application, being the nomination referred to in cl.187.233(1) was refused by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 10 August 2018, and as such there was no approved nomination.

6. The applicants were represented in relation to the review by their registered migration agent and lawyer, Mr Rick Gunn, of Carina Ford and Associates.

7. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

   CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

8. The issue in the present case is whether there is an approved nomination.

   Nomination of a position

9. Clause 187.233 as applicable in this case is set out in full in an attachment to this decision. Essentially, it requires that the position to which the application relates be the subject of an application for approval of a nomination in the Direct Entry stream, located in regional Australia. The position must be the one that was the subject of the declaration made as part of the current visa application. In addition, where the associated nomination was made on or after 1 July 2017, it must identify the applicant in relation to the position.

10. In addition, this criterion also requires that:

    ·the person who will employ the applicant is the person who made the nomination;

    ·the nomination has been approved and has not been subsequently withdrawn;

    ·there is no ‘adverse information’ known to Immigration about the person who made the nomination or a person ‘associated with’ that person (within the meaning of r.1.13A and r.1.13B of the Regulations); or it is reasonable to disregard any such information;

    ·the position is still available to the applicant; and

    ·the visa application was made no more than six months after the nomination of the position was approved.

11. The applicant applied for the visa on the basis of the nomination made by the nominator, Mr Hussain Mgoter on 8 January 2017, for approval of the position of Motor Mechanic (ANZSCO 321211). The nomination identified the position in respect of which the relevant declaration was made. The nomination was refused by the Department on 10 August 2018.

12. The nominator applied for a review of that decision. On 31 March 2020, the Tribunal set aside the Department’s decision and substituted a decision approving the nomination.

13. As the relevant nomination in respect of the visa applicant has been approved, the applicant meets the requirements of cl.187.233(3).

14. Therefore, cl.187.233 is met.

15. Given these findings, the appropriate course is to remit the visa application to the Minister to consider the remaining criteria for the visa.

16. The delegate made a decision that the second and third named applicants did not satisfy cl.187.311, which requires that they be members of the family unit of a person (the primary applicant) who holds a Subclass 187 visa granted on the basis of satisfying the primary criteria for the grant of the visa and having made a combined application with the primary applicant.

17. The Tribunal is unable to make a direction that the second and third named applicants meet this criterion, because at the time of the Tribunal’s decision, the first named applicant did not hold a Subclass 187 visa. The Tribunal refers the case of the second and third named applicants to the Department to consider the applications afresh.

    DECISION

18. The Tribunal remits the applications for Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN) visas for reconsideration, with the direction that the first named applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) visa:

    ·cl.187.233(3) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

    Phoebe Dunn
    Member

    
    

    ATTACHMENT A

    187.233(1)     The position to which the application relates is the position:

    (a)nominated in an application for approval that seeks to meet the requirements of:

    (i)subparagraph 5.19(4)(h)(ii); or

    (ii)subregulation 5.19(4) as in force before 1 July 2012; and

    (b)in relation to which the declaration mentioned in paragraph 1114C(3)(d) of Schedule 1 was made in the application for the grant of the visa.

    (2)     The person who will employ the applicant is the person who made the nomination.

    (3)     The Minister has approved the nomination.

    (4)     The nomination has not subsequently been withdrawn.

    (4A)    Either:

    (a)there is no adverse information known to Immigration about the person who made the nomination or a person associated with that person; or

    (b)it is reasonable to disregard any adverse information known to Immigration about the person who made the nomination or a person associated with that person.

    (5)     The position is still available to the applicant.

    (6)     The application for the visa is made no more than 6 months after the Minister approved the nomination.