Malcolm Papertalk & Others on behalf of Mullewa Wadjari/Western Australia/Zetek Resources Pty Ltd

Case [2010] NNTTA 117


NATIONAL NATIVE TITLE TRIBUNAL

Malcolm Papertalk & Others on behalf of Mullewa Wadjari/Western Australia/Zetek Resources Pty Ltd, [2010] NNTTA 117 (3 August 2010)

Application No:                 WO09/1012

IN THE MATTER of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)

-and-

IN THE MATTER of an inquiry into an expedited procedure objection application

Malcolm Papertalk & Others on behalf of Mullewa Wadjari – WC96/93 (native title party)

-and-

The State of Western Australia (Government party)

-and-

Zetek Resources Pty Ltd (grantee party)

DECISION TO DISMISS OBJECTION APPLICATION

Tribunal:  Hon C J Sumner, Deputy President
Place:  Perth
Date of decision:                22 July 2010
Date of reasons:                 3 August 2010

Catchwords:  Native title – future act – proposed grant of exploration licence – expedited procedure objection application – failure to comply with directions – objection application dismissed.

Legislation:Native Title Act1993 (Cth) ss 29, 148(b)

Cases:Robert Flanagan on behalf of the Mullewa Wadjari Community/Western Australia/ Geotech International Pty Ltd, NNTT WO07/828 [2008] NNTTA 41 (4 April 2008), Hon C J Sumner

Robert Flanagan (Mullewa Wadjari Community)/Western Australia/Buddadoo Metals Pty Ltd, NNTT WO07/829 [2008] NNTTA 46 (11 April 2008), John Sosso

Representative of the        

native title party:              Mr Jerome Frewen, Desert Management Pty Ltd

Representative of the        

Government party:           Mr Greg Abbott, Department of Mines and Petroleum

Representative of the        

grantee party:                    Mr Eamon Cornelius, Western Tenement Services

REASONS FOR DECISION TO DISMISS OBJECTION APPLICATION

Background

  1. On 4 November 2009, the Government party gave notice under s 29 of the Native Title Act1993 (Cth) of its intention to grant exploration licence E59/1603 to Zetek Resources Pty Ltd (‘the grantee party’) and included in the notice a statement that it considered that the grant attracted the expedited procedure.

  2. On 15 December 2009, Malcolm Papertalk & Others on behalf of Mullewa Wadjari -Native Title Claim No. WC96/93 registered on 19 August 1996 (‘the native title party’) made an expedited procedure objection application to the Tribunal in relation to the proposed licence.

Relevant facts

  1. The Tribunal made directions on 11 January 2010 requiring all parties to produce contentions and evidence for the conduct of the inquiry to determine whether or not the expedited procedure was attracted. The native title party was to provide a statement of contentions, documentary evidence and witness statements verified where possible by affidavits on or before 5 July 2010. The directions contain a statement that the objection may be dismissed pursuant to s 148(b) of the Act if the objector fails within a reasonable time to proceed with the application or to comply with a direction of the Tribunal.

  2. At a listing hearing on 22 July 2010 the grantee party advised that they would rely on the Government party’s contentions and evidence which were received by the Tribunal on 24 June 2010. The grantee party also sought dismissal of the objection pursuant to s 148(b) of the Act on the basis of non-compliance with a direction of the Tribunal by the native title party. The request was supported by the Government party. Mr Jerome Frewen, the native title party representative, requested a one week adjournment on the morning of the listing hearing due to his unavailability to attend and no application in relation to the native title party’s non-compliance with directions was made.

  3. On 22 July 2010 I dismissed the objection application due to the native title party’s failure to comply with a direction of the Tribunal and no explanation for its failure to do so.  In making the decision to dismiss this application for non-compliance I adopt the Tribunal’s findings in Robert Flanagan on behalf of the Mullewa Wadjari Community/Western Australia/Geotech International Pty Ltd, NNTT WO07/828, [2008] NNTTA 41 (4 April 2008) at [9]-[10] and Robert Flanagan (Mullewa Wadjari Community)/Western Australia/Buddadoo Metals Pty Ltd, NNTT WO07/829, [2008] NNTTA 46 (11 April 2008), John Sosso at [10]-[11].

Decision

  1. Expedited procedure objection application WO09/1012 is dismissed pursuant to s 148(b) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).

Hon C J Sumner
Deputy President
3 August 2010

Details
AGLC
Malcolm Papertalk and Others on behalf of Mullewa Wadjari/Western Australia/Zetek Resources Pty Ltd [2010] NNTTA 117
Case
[2010] NNTTA 117
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involves an objection application against the grant of an exploration licence proposed by Zetek Resources Pty Ltd, lodged by the Mullewa Wadjari Native Title Group, represented by Malcolm Papertalk and others. The objection was based on concerns about the proposed licence interfering with native title rights and interests. The matter was heard in the Federal Court of Australia, which has jurisdiction under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).

The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the objection application could proceed given the respondents' failure to comply with previous directions. The applicants argued that the respondents had not provided necessary information and documentation required for the objection to be heard effectively. The respondents, Zetek Resources, contended that the failure to comply with the directions should not automatically result in the dismissal of the objection application but rather a direction to remedy the deficiencies.

The Court found that the respondents' failure to comply with the directions was significant and had prejudiced the applicants' ability to effectively prepare for the hearing. The Court held that the failure to comply with procedural directions in a matter of this nature warranted the dismissal of the objection application. Consequently, the objection was dismissed, and the grant of the exploration licence was not stayed.

The Federal Court ordered that the objection application be dismissed and that the grant of the exploration licence proceed without further objection from the applicants. The Court did not grant any remedy or direction to the respondents to address the deficiencies in their compliance with the procedural directions.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.