Malberd & Malberd & Anor (No 2)

Case [2010] FamCA 586


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

MALBERD & MALBERD AND ANOR (NO. 2) [2010] FamCA 586
FAMILY LAW – CONTRAVENTION – defective application – application dismissed
FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – With whom a child spends time – Interim application for suspension of time between the father and the children – allegations of physical abuse – application granted
APPLICANT: Ms Malberd
RESPONDENT: Mr Malberd
SECOND RESPONDENT: Ms Ariste
FILE NUMBER: NCC 280 of 2010
DATE DELIVERED: 14 July 2010
PLACE DELIVERED: Sydney
PLACE HEARD: Sydney
JUDGMENT OF: Ainslie - Wallace J
HEARING DATE: 13 July 2010

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: Ms Rees SC
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: York Family Law
THE RESPONDENT: Father in person
SOLICITOR FOR THE SECOND RESPONDENT: Ms Kensell, agent for Boyd Olsen Lawyers

Orders

  1. Pending further order, the father’s time with the children as provided for in the consent orders made 15th May 2009 be suspended.

  2. The Contravention application filed on 21 June 2010 by the father be dismissed.

  3. The parties forthwith make arrangements for further appointments with Dr M to discuss the present allegations and issues and to provide him with the affidavits filed in relation to them and the mother’s solicitor provide him with a copy of the reasons for decision.

  4. That pursuant to Section 68L of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) an Independent Children’s Lawyer be appointed for the children J (female) born … November 1997; T (female) born … March 2000; and W (male) born … September 2002 (“the children”).

  5. Legal Aid New South Wales is requested to make arrangements as soon as practicable for appropriate representation for the children.

  6. That the Court is to advise the Senior Solicitor, Family Law Litigation Section, Legal Aid NSW of this order.

  7. That each party make available to Legal Aid NSW copies of all applications and affidavits upon which that party relies together with any existing orders and copies of any relevant reports.

  8. I note that Ms Jane Costigan, solicitor for Legal Aid NSW, was previously appointed as the Independent Children’s Lawyer in this matter and it is recommended that she be re-appointed.

  9. The parties have liberty to apply to the Docket Registrar on seven days notice.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Malberd & Malberd and Anor is approved pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY

FILE NUMBER: NCC 280 of 2010

MS MALBERD

Applicant

And

MR MALBERD

Respondent

And

MS ARISTE

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. Ms Malberd (“the mother”) applies for orders suspending time spent between the father, Mr Malberd (“the father”) and the three children of the marriage; J (born in November 1997), T (born in March 2000) and W (born in September 2002).  The father applies for the mother to be dealt with for contravening parenting orders.

Background

  1. The parties separated in January 2005 and in November 2006 by agreement between themselves, the children lived with each parent on alternate weeks.  After separation, the father…

Continue reading Malberd & Malberd & Anor (No 2)

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Malberd & Malberd & Anor (No 2) [2010] FamCA 586
Case
[2010] FamCA 586
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Malberd & Malberd & Anor (No 2)*, Ainslie-Wallace J considered an application concerning the welfare of three children. The dispute involved allegations of contravention of existing consent orders made on 15 May 2009, which governed the father's time with the children. The father had filed a contravention application on 21 June 2010.

The court was required to determine whether the father had contravened the consent orders and, consequently, what orders were appropriate for the children's welfare and their time with each parent. The court also considered the need for ongoing professional assessment of the children and the appointment of an Independent Children's Lawyer.

Ainslie-Wallace J reasoned that the father's time with the children should be suspended pending further order, indicating a serious concern for their well-being. The father's contravention application was dismissed. The court directed the parties to arrange further appointments with Dr M to discuss the allegations and issues, providing him with relevant affidavits and the reasons for the decision. Crucially, an Independent Children's Lawyer was appointed for the children pursuant to section 68L of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth), with a recommendation for the re-appointment of Ms Jane Costigan. Legal Aid New South Wales was requested to arrange representation for the children and was to be provided with all relevant documentation.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

Pending further order, the father’s time with the children as provided for in the consent orders made 15th May 2009 be suspended.

2.

The Contravention application filed on 21 June 2010 by the father be dismissed.

3.

The parties forthwith make arrangements for further appointments with Dr M to discuss the present allegations and issues and to provide him with the affidavits filed in relation to them and the mother’s solicitor provide him with a copy of the reasons for decision.

4.

That pursuant to Section 68L of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) an Independent Children’s Lawyer be appointed for the children J (female) born … November 1997; T (female) born … March 2000; and W (male) born … September 2002 (“the children”).

5.

Legal Aid New South Wales is requested to make arrangements as soon as practicable for appropriate representation for the children.

6.

That the Court is to advise the Senior Solicitor, Family Law Litigation Section, Legal Aid NSW of this order.

7.

That each party make available to Legal Aid NSW copies of all applications and affidavits upon which that party relies together with any existing orders and copies of any relevant reports.

8.

I note that Ms Jane Costigan, solicitor for Legal Aid NSW, was previously appointed as the Independent Children’s Lawyer in this matter and it is recommended that she be re-appointed.

9.

The parties have liberty to apply to the Docket Registrar on seven days notice.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.