Mahant (Migration)
[2019] AATA 6542
•9 October 2019
Mahant (Migration) [2019] AATA 6542 (9 October 2019)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION: Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Miss Shrishti Paresh Mahant
CASE NUMBER: 1910552
DIBP REFERENCE(S): BCC2018/5838965
MEMBER: Antonio Dronjic
DATE AND TIME OF
ORAL DECISION AND REASONS: 9 October 2019 at 11:39 am (VIC time)
DATE OF WRITTEN RECORD: 10 February 2020
PLACE OF DECISION: Melbourne
DECISION: The Tribunal affirms the decision under review.
Statement made on 10 February 2020 at 2:08pm
CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa – Subclass 485 (Temporary Graduate) – no National Police Check within 12 months before visa application – decision under review affirmed
LEGISLATION
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Schedule 2, cl 485.213
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 18 April 2019 to refuse to grant the visa applicant a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) Subclass 485 visa under the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).
The delegate refused to grant the visa because the applicant did not satisfy cl.485.213 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations because, when the visa application was made, it was not accompanied by evidence that the applicant, and each person included in the application who is at least 16, had applied for an Australian Federal Police (AFP) check during the 12 months immediately before the day the application was made.
The applicant applied to the Tribunal on 27 April 2019, for review of the delegate’s decision. With their application, the applicants submitted a copy of the primary decision record according to which:
·The applicant lodged an application for a Temporary Graduate (Post Study Work) visa on 27 December 2018 and declared in the application form that she did not apply for an Australian Federal Police check in the last 12 months.
·On 22 March 2019, the applicant attached a receipt for an Australian Federal Police check. The receipt confirmed that the date of check was 22 March 2019 which is not during the 12 months immediately before the day the application was made.
In her evidence, the applicant confirmed that that she applied for the AFP Clearance on 22 March 2019 and that her visa application for subclass 485 visa was lodged with the Department on 27 December 2018.
At the hearing on 9 October 2019, the Tribunal made an oral decision and gave an oral statement of decision and reasons. The following is the written record of those reasons.
STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
Based on the evidence before me, including your oral evidence given today at the hearing, I am not satisfied that, at the time when the application was made, it was accompanied by the evidence that you have applied for the Australian Federal Police check during the 12 months immediately before the date the application was made. For that reason I find that you do not meet the requirements of clause 485.213 and I am affirming the decision made by the Department.
DECISION
The Tribunal affirms the decision under review.
Antonio Dronjic Member
Case Number 1910552 Page 2 of 2
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
0
0
0