Magistrates' Court General Civil Procedure Amendment (Service Out of Jurisdiction) Rules 2018 (Vic)

Case
No judgment structure available for this case.

Magistrates' Court General Civil Procedure Amendment (Service Out of Jurisdiction) Rules 2018

S.R. No. 159/2018

TABLE OF PROVISIONS

Rule  Page

1Object

2Authorising provisions

3Commencement

4Principal Rules

5Order 7 substituted

6New Rule 37A.07 substituted

7New Form 7A substituted

═════════════

Endnotes

STATUTORY RULES 2018

S.R. No. 159/2018

Magistrates' Court Act 1989

Magistrates' Court General Civil Procedure Amendment (Service Out of Jurisdiction) Rules 2018

The Chief Magistrate together with 2 Deputy Chief Magistrates jointly make the following Rules:

1Object

The object of these Rules is to amend the Magistrates' Court General Civil Procedure Rules 2010 to replace the existing rules for the service out of Australia of originating process (other than documents which may be served under Division 2 of Part 2 of the Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 of the Commonwealth) with rules which are harmonised with those of like jurisdictions.

2Authorising provisions

These Rules are made under section 16 of the Magistrates' Court Act 1989 and all other enabling powers.

3Commencement

These Rules come into operation on 15 October 2018.

4Principal Rules

In these Rules, the Magistrates' Court General Civil Procedure Rules 2010[1] are called the Principal Rules.

5Order 7 substituted

For Order 7 of the Principal Rules substitute

"ORDER 7—SERVICE OUT OF AUSTRALIA

7.01.1Definition

In this Order, unless the context or subject matter otherwise requires—

originating process means a complaint, counterclaim, notice or any other process in which a claim is made.

7.01Order does not apply to service in New Zealand of documents for or in certain Trans-Tasman proceedings

This Order (which contains rules on service out of Australia) does not apply to service in New Zealand of an originating process for, or of any other document to be served in or for, a proceeding an originating process for which may be served in New Zealand under Division 2 of Part 2 of the Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 of the Commonwealth.

7.02When allowed without leave

An originating process may be served out of Australia without leave in the following cases—

(a)when the claim is founded on a tortious act or omission—

(i)which was done or which occurred wholly or partly in Victoria; or

(ii)in respect of which the damage was sustained wholly or partly in Victoria;

(b)when the claim is for the enforcement, rescission, dissolution, annulment, cancellation, rectification, interpretation or other treatment of, or for damages or other relief in respect of a breach of, a contract which—

(i)was made or entered into in Victoria; or

(ii)was made by or through an agent trading or residing within Victoria; or

(iii)was to be wholly or in part performed in Victoria; or

(iv)was by its terms or by implication to be governed by Victorian law or to be enforceable or cognizable in a Victorian court;

(c)when the claim is in respect of a breach in Victoria of any contract, wherever made, whether or not that breach was preceded or accompanied by a breach out of Victoria that rendered impossible the performance of that part of the contract that ought to have been performed in Victoria;

(d)when the claim—

(i)is for an injunction to compel or restrain the performance of any act in Victoria; or

(ii)is for interim or ancillary relief in respect of any matter or thing in or connected with Victoria, where such relief is sought in relation to judicial or arbitral proceedings commenced or to be commenced, or an arbitration agreement made, in or outside Victoria; or

(iii)without limiting subparagraph (ii), is an application for a freezing order or ancillary order under Order 37A in respect of any matter or thing in or connected with Victoria;

(e)when the claim relates to the carrying out or discharge of the trusts of any written instrument of which the person to be served is a trustee and which ought to be carried out or discharged according to Victorian law;

(f)when any person out of Australia is—

(i)a necessary or proper party to a proceeding properly brought against another person served or to be served (whether within Victoria or outside Victoria) under any other provision of these Rules; or

(ii)a defendant to a claim for contribution or indemnity in respect of a liability enforceable by a proceeding in the Court;

(g)when the claim arises under an Victorian enactment and—

(i)any act or omission to which the claim relates was done or occurred in Victoria; or

(ii)any loss or damage to which the claim relates was sustained in Victoria; or

(iii)the enactment applies expressly or by implication to an act or omission that was done or occurred outside Australia in the circumstances alleged; or

(iv)the enactment expressly or by implication confers jurisdiction on the Court over persons outside Australia (in which case any requirements of the enactment relating to service must be complied with);

(h)when the person to be served has submitted to the jurisdiction of the Court;

(i)when a claim is made for restitution or for the remedy of constructive trust and the person to be alleged liability of the person to be served arises out of an act or omission that was done or occurred wholly or partly in Victoria;

(j)when it is sought to recognise or enforce any judgment;

(k)when the claim is founded on a cause of action arising in Victoria;

(l)when the claim affects the person to be served in respect of the person's membership of a corporation incorporated in Victoria, or of a partnership or an association formed or carrying on any part of its affairs in Victoria;

(m)when the claim—

(i)relates to an arbitration held in Victoria or governed by Victorian law; or

(ii)is to enforce in Victoria an arbitral award wherever made; or

(iii)is for orders necessary or convenient for carrying into effect in Victoria the whole or any part of an arbitral award wherever made;

(n)when the claim, so far as concerns the person to be served, falls partly within one or more of the above paragraphs and, as to the residue, within one or more of the others of the above paragraphs.

Note

If a proceeding is commenced in the Court and originating process is served out of Australia under this Rule but the Court later decides that it is more appropriate that the proceeding be determined by a court of another Australian jurisdiction, the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 may enable the proceeding to be transferred to the Supreme Court to make an order transferring the proceeding to the Supreme Court or to the Supreme Court of that other Australian jurisdiction.

7.03When allowed with leave

(1)In any proceeding when service is not allowed under Rule 7.02, an originating process may be served out of Australia with the leave of the Court.

(2)An application for leave under this Rule must be made on notice to every party other than the person intended to be served.

(3)A sealed copy of every order made under this Rule must be served with the document to which it relates.

(4)An application for leave under this Rule must be supported by an affidavit stating any facts or matters related to the desirability of the Court assuming jurisdiction, including the place or country in which the person to be served is or possibly may be found, and whether or not the person to be served is an Australian citizen.

(5)The Court may grant an application for leave if satisfied that—

(a)the claim has a real and substantial connection with Victoria; and

(b)Victoria is an appropriate forum for the hearing of the proceeding; and

(c)in all the circumstances the Court should assume jurisdiction.

7.04Court's discretion whether to assume jurisdiction

(1)On application by a person on whom an originating process has been served out of Australia, the Court may by order set aside the originating process or its service on the person or dismiss or stay the proceeding.

(2)Without limiting paragraph (1), the Court may make an order under this Rule if satisfied—

(a)that service out of Australia of the originating process is not authorised by these Rules; or

(b)that the Court is an inappropriate forum for the hearing of the proceeding; or

(c)that the claim has insufficient prospects of success to warrant putting the person served out of Australia to the time, expense and trouble of defending the claim.

7.05Notice to person served out of Australia

If a person is to be served out of Australia with an originating process, the person must also be served with a notice in Form 7A informing the person of—

(a)the scope of the jurisdiction of the Court in respect of claims against persons who are served out of Australia; and

(b)the grounds alleged by the plaintiff to found jurisdiction; and

(c)the person's right to apply for an order setting aside the originating process or its service on the person or dismissing or staying the proceeding.

7.06Time for filing a notice of defence

Except when the Court otherwise orders, a defendant who has been served out of Australia must give notice of defence within 42 days from the date of service.

7.07Leave to proceed where no notice of defence by person

(1)If an originating process is served on a person out of Australia and the person does give notice of defence, the party serving the document may not proceed against the person served except by leave of the Court.

(2)An application for leave under paragraph (1) may be made without serving notice of the application on the person served with the originating process.

7.08Service of other documents out of Australia

Any document other than an originating process may be served out of Australia with the leave of the Court, which may be given with any directions that the Court thinks fit.

7.09Mode of service

A document to be served out of Australia need not be personally served on a person so long as it is served on the person in accordance with the law of the country in which service is effected.

__________________".

6New Rule 37A.07 substituted

For Rule 37A.07 of the Principal Rules substitute

"37A.07   Service

A freezing order—

(a)must be authenticated pursuant to Rule 60.04;

(b)when served, must be served together with a copy of—

(i)the application, or, if none was filed, any draft application produced to the Court;

(ii)the material (other than material excepted by the Court as confidential) that was relied on by the applicant at the hearing when the order was made;

(iii)a transcript or, if none is available, a note, of any oral allegation of fact that was made and of any oral submission that was put, to the Court; and

(iv)the complaint, or, if none was filed, any draft complaint produced to the Court.

Note

An application for a freezing order or an ancillary order may be served on a person who is out of Australia where such service is authorised by or under Order 7—see, in particular, Rule 7.02(d).".

7New Form 7A substituted

For Form 7A of the Principal Rules substitute

"FORM 7A

Rule 7.05

SERVICE OUT OF AUSTRALIA—NOTICE TO DEFENDANT SERVED OUT OF AUSTRALIA

[heading as in Form 5A]

To the Defendant:

1. You have been served with an originating process out of Australia under Rules 7.01.1 to 7.09 of the Magistrates' Court General Civil Procedure Rules 2010 of the Magistrates' Court of Victoria. A copy of those Rules is enclosed for your information. They show the scope of the jurisdiction of the Court in respect of claims against persons who are served out of Australia.

2.     The grounds alleged by the plaintiff to support its claim to be entitled to serve you out of Australia are:

[specify grounds]

3.     If you do not give notice of defence in accordance with the Rules of the Court, the Court may, on application made by you, make an order setting aside the complaint or its service on you or dismissing or staying the proceeding.  Without limiting the Court's powers in this regard, the Court may make such an order if satisfied that—

(a)the service was not authorised by the Rules of the Court; or

(b)this Court is an inappropriate forum for the trial of the proceeding; or

(c)the claim has insufficient prospects of success to warrant putting you to the time, expense and trouble of defending the claim.

4.     Alternatively you may give notice of defence (in the form prescribed by the Rules of the Court) within the time required under the Rules of the Court.

5.     If you give notice of defence, additional procedural obligations (such as an obligation to file a notice of defence) may apply to you in accordance with the Rules of the Court.

6.     If you do not give notice of defence within the time required under the Rules of the Court and you have not made an application of a kind referred to in paragraph 3, the Court may give leave to the plaintiff to proceed against you without further notice.

__________________".

Dated:    11 October 2018

PETER HENRY LAURITSEN,


Chief Magistrate

FELICITY ANNE BROUGHTON,


Deputy Chief Magistrate

LANCE IVAN MARTIN,


Deputy Chief Magistrate

═════════════

Endnotes


[1] Rule 4: S.R. No. 140/2010. Reprint No. 3 as at 15 March 2018. Reprinted to S.R. No. 128/2017.

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0