Magistrates Court (Civil Proceedings) Amendment Rules 2016 (WA)
30 September 2016 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, WA 4177 JU302
Magistrates Court (Civil Proceedings) Act 2004
Magistrates Court (Civil Proceedings)
Amendment Rules 2016
Made by the Magistrates Court in accordance with the Magistrates Court
Act 2004 section 39.1. Citation
These rules are the Magistrates Court (Civil Proceedings)
Amendment Rules 2016.2. Commencement
These rules come into operation as follows —
(a) rules 1 and 2 — on the day on which these rules are published in the Gazette; (b) the rest of the rules — on the day after that day. 3. Rules amended
These rules amend the Magistrates Court (Civil Proceedings)
Rules 2005.4. Rule 7 amended
In rule 7(3) delete “claim in accordance with rule 41A.” and
insert:claim.
5. Rule 7A inserted
After rule 7 insert:
7A. Statement of claim (1) Unless the party has lodged and served its statement of
claim with its claim under rule 7 the party must lodge
and serve the statement of claim —
(a) if the claim is an originating claim, within that indicates an intention to defend the claim, or such other time as is ordered by the registrar; and
(b)
if the claim is a counterclaim or third party claim, within 14 days after the party has
| 4178 | GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, WA | 30 September 2016 |
received a response that indicates an intention
to defend the claim, or such other time as isordered by the registrar.
(2) A statement of claim must be in the approved form. (3) Unless otherwise ordered by the registrar under
rule 41A, the statement of claim must contain all of the
following —
(a) a summary of the facts relevant to the claim; (b) the legal basis of the claim; (c) the basic contentions of the party; (d) the remedy or relief claimed; (e) if the amount of the claim has been reduced in order to bring the claim within the jurisdictional limit, a statement to that effect.
6. Rule 8 amended
(1) In rule 8(2)(a) delete “rule 41B; and” and insert: rule 10; and (2) In rule 8(3) delete “claim in accordance with rule 41A.” and
insert:claim. 7. Rule 9 amended
Delete rule 9(1A) and insert:
(1A) If a statement of claim has been lodged together with a claim under rule 7(3) or 8(3), a response may, but need not, be lodged together with a statement of defence. 8. Rule 10 inserted
At the end of Part 2 insert:
10. Statement of defence
(1) Unless the party has lodged and served its statement of
defence with its response under rule 9, the party must
lodge and serve its statement of defence within
14 days, or such other time as is ordered by the
30 September 2016 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, WA 4179 registrar, after the party has been served with the
relevant statement of claim.
(2) A statement of defence must be in the approved form. (3) Unless otherwise ordered by the registrar under
rule 41B, the statement of defence must contain all of
the following —
(a) a summary of the facts relevant to the defence; (b) the legal basis of the defence; (c) the basic contentions of the party; (d) the details of anyone who the party alleges is liable for the claim and the grounds upon which the party so alleges.
9. Rule 39 amended
In rule 39(1) delete “receives from the Court a copy of a
response that indicates an intention to defend the claim.” and
insert:is served with a statement of defence.
10. Rule 40 amended
After rule 40(2)(b) insert:
(ba) order what statements of claim or defence must
contain;
11. Rules 41A and 41B replaced
Delete rules 41A and 41B and insert:
41A. Statement of claim, effect of order to lodge If the registrar at the pre-trial conference orders a party to lodge and serve a statement of claim, the party must do so in accordance with rule 7A(2) and (3).
41B. Statement of defence, effect of order to lodge If the registrar at the pre-trial conference orders a party
to lodge and serve a statement of defence, the party
must do so in accordance with rule 10(2) and (3).
| 4180 | GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, WA | 30 September 2016 |
12. Part 15 Division 3 inserted
At the end of Part 15 insert:
Division 3 — Security for costs
94A. Term used: claimant In this Division — claimant includes a defendant counterclaiming in
respect of a claim not arising out of the claim made
against the defendant.94B. Factors that are not grounds for ordering security
for costsThe Court may order security for costs to be given by a
claimant, but an order must not be made merely on
account of the poverty of the claimant or the likely
inability of the claimant to pay any costs which may be
awarded against the claimant.94C. Grounds for ordering security for costs Without limiting rule 94B, the Court may order
security for costs to be given by the claimant in the
following circumstances —
(a)
the claimant is ordinarily resident out of the jurisdiction, notwithstanding that the claimant may be temporarily within the jurisdiction;
(b)
the claimant is about to depart from the jurisdiction;
(c)
the claimant enjoys within the jurisdiction some privilege which renders the claimant immune, wholly or partially, from the normal processes of execution;
(d)
the claimant is an undischarged bankrupt or a person who has suspended, or given notice of suspension of, debts;
(e)
the claimant is a company in liquidation or under official management, or a company in respect of which a receiver of its property has been appointed;
(f)
the claimant is a relator suing for the enforcement or declaration of some public right or to have some public trust carried out or some charitable scheme settled;
(g)
the claimant is in default in respect of any costs ordered to be paid by the claimant in any proceedings previously brought by the claimant against the same defendant or another
30 September 2016 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, WA 4181 defendant for substantially the same cause of action or in relation to substantially the same subject matter;
(h) the claimant is a person who has in the past vexatiously brought litigation against the same defendant or against any other defendant; (i) the claimant is suing the Sheriff in respect of anything done or omitted to be done by the Sheriff or the Sheriff’s officers in the execution of any judgment of the Court.
94D. Court has discretion (1) The granting of security may be in the discretion of the
Court.(2) In determining whether an order should be made, the
Court may take the following into consideration —
(a) the prima facie merits of the claim; (b)
what property within the jurisdiction may be available to satisfy any order for costs against the claimant;
(c)
whether the normal processes of the Court would be available within the jurisdiction for enforcement of any order for costs made against the claimant.
94E. Manner of giving security In fixing security the Court may direct the form and manner in which the security is to be given and may from time to time vary the amount and form of the
security. 94F. Action may be stayed Where security is ordered the action or other
proceedings may be stayed until the security is
furnished, unless the Court otherwise orders.94G. Payment out (1) Where money has been paid into Court as security for
costs and the action has been finally disposed of, the
amount of the security is to be paid out to the party for
whose security it was furnished to the extent that costs
are due from the securer to such party.(2) Unless the Court orders otherwise, the Principal
Registrar is to pay out the security accordingly, and the
balance (if any) may be refunded to the securer without
the necessity for any special order.
| 4182 | GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, WA | 30 September 2016 |
13. Rule 128 amended
In rule 128(2) after “otherwise,” insert:
rule 29,
Made by the Magistrates Court,
STEVEN HEATH, Chief Magistrate.
———————————
0
0
0