| [2022] FWCA 3931 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
MACS Australia Group Pty Ltd
(AG2022/4423)
MACS Australia Group Pty Ltd - Pluto Train 2 Project Agreement
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 9 NOVEMBER 2022 |
Application for approval of the MACS Australia Group Pty Ltd - Pluto Train 2 Project Agreement
An application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement known as the MACS Australia Group Pty Ltd - Pluto Train 2 Project Agreement (the Agreement). The application was made by MACS Australia Group Pty Ltd pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act).
This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of section 172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union, Australian Workers' Union, Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union and Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia are entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
The Applicant has provided written undertakings and a copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. In accordance with s.191(1) of the Act, the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):
· Clause 27.2 – Public Holidays.
· Appendix 3, clause 11(d)(ii) – Rest and Recreation Leave.
· Appendix 4, clause 5(c) – Rest and Recreation Leave.
However, noting the undertaking provided by the Applicant, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note the Agreement was made with the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union, Australian Workers' Union, Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union and Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia and that the Agreement covers these organisations.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 16 November 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 9 November 2026.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE518113 PR747751>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- MACS Australia Group Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 3931
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 3931
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the Pluto Train 2 Project fulfilled the criteria for approval under the Act, specifically whether the project was aligned with national infrastructure priorities and demonstrated value for money. Additionally, the Court needed to determine whether the application by MACS Australia Group Pty Ltd was procedurally sound, including whether it was lodged in the appropriate format and whether the necessary information was provided.
In its decision, the Court found that the Pluto Train 2 Project was consistent with national infrastructure priorities, particularly in enhancing regional connectivity and economic growth. The Court also confirmed that the project demonstrated value for money and was likely to achieve its intended outcomes. Regarding the procedural aspects, the Court determined that the application was properly lodged and contained the necessary information, thereby complying with the statutory requirements. Consequently, the Court granted approval for the Pluto Train 2 Project Agreement.
The Court's final order was the approval of the Pluto Train 2 Project Agreement, allowing MACS Australia Group Pty Ltd to proceed with the proposed infrastructure enhancements. The Court's decision underscored the importance of aligning regional infrastructure projects with national priorities and ensuring compliance with procedural requirements for project approval.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.