Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Macquarie Units Pty Ltd v Sunchen Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCA 116 Hearing dates: 21 September 2022 Date of orders: 26 May 2023 Decision date: 26 May 2023 Before: Meagher JA at [1];
White JA at [111];
Brereton JA at [122]Decision: 1. Extend the time for the filing of the notice of appeal to 10 December 2021.
2. Dismiss the appeal.
3. The appellants pay the respondents’ costs of the appeal.
Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Hearings — Where appellants sought separate inquiry as to assessment of equitable compensation and common law damages — Whether primary judge denied appellants procedural fairness by dismissing claims because they had not proved they suffered any loss
COMPANIES — Shares — Rectification of share register — laches defence
EQUITY — Defences — Laches — Whether claim to rectification of share register barred by laches
Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 175
Cases Cited: Akierman Holdings Pty Ltd v Akerman (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 970
Artistic Builders Pty Ltd v Elliot & Tuthill (Mortgages) Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 16
Burns Philp Trust Co Pty Ltd v Kwikasair Freightliners Ltd (1963) 63 SR (NSW) 492
Clegg v Edmondson (1857) 8 De GM & G 787 [44 ER 593]
Crawley v Short [2009] NSWCA 410; (2009) 76 ACSR 286
Edmonds v Donovan (2005) 12 VR 513; [2005] VSCA 27
Erlanger v The New Sombrero Phosphate Co (1878) 3 App Cas 1218
Fysh v Page (1956) 96 CLR 233; [1956] HCA 13
Grant v John Grant & Sons Pty Ltd (1950) 82 CLR 1; [1950] HCA 54
Hatch v Hatch (1804) 9 Ves 292 [32 ER 615]
In re Jarvis [1958] 1 WLR 815
LindsayPetroleum Co v Hurd (1874) LR 5 PC 221
Orr v Ford (1989) 167 CLR 316; [1989] HCA 4
Savage v Lunn [1998] NSWCA 203
Streeter v Western Areas Exploration Pty Ltd (No 2) (2011) 278 ALR 291; [2011] WASCA 17
Twigg v Twigg [2022] NSWCA 68; (2022) 402 ALR 119
Twigg v Twigg(No 4) [2020] NSWSC 1159; (2020) 147 ACSR 389
Warman International Ltd v Dwyer (1995) 182 CLR 544; [1995] HCA 18
Texts Cited: Heydon, Heydon on Contract (2019, LawBook Company)
Heydon, Leeming and Turner, Meagher, Gummow & Lehane’s Equity: Doctrines and Remedies (5th ed, 2015, LexisNexis Butterworths)
Lindley, The Law of Companies (6th ed, 1902, Sweet and Maxwell)
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Macquarie Units Pty Ltd (First Appellant)
Steve Nassif (Second Appellant)
MC 0380 Pty Ltd (Third Appellant)
Sunchen Pty Ltd (First Respondent)
Jianwei Sun (Second Respondent)
Sunshine Group Australia Pty Ltd (Third Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
D Sulan SC with J Entwistle (Appellants)
NJ Kidd SC (Respondents)
Eden King Lawyers (Appellants)
Lawside…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Macquarie Units Pty Ltd v Sunchen Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2023] NSWCA 116
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether the primary judge had denied the appellants procedural fairness by dismissing their claims for loss without allowing for a separate inquiry into the assessment of equitable compensation and common law damages. Additionally, the Court had to consider whether the defence of laches barred the appellants' claim for rectification of the share register.
The Court of Appeal found that the primary judge had not denied the appellants procedural fairness. The judge had dismissed the claims because the appellants had failed to prove they suffered any loss, which was a necessary element of their causes of action. The Court also held that the defence of laches was applicable and barred the claim for rectification of the share register, as there had been an inordinate delay by the appellants in pursuing this claim, and this delay had prejudiced the respondents.
The Court of Appeal ordered that the time for filing the notice of appeal be extended to 10 December 2021, but ultimately dismissed the appeal. The appellants were ordered to pay the respondents' costs of the appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Extend the time for the filing of the notice of appeal to 10 December 2021.
2. Dismiss the appeal.
3. The appellants pay the respondents’ costs of the appeal.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.