MACQUARIE BANK LIMITED & ORS v NATIONWIDE NEWS PTY LIMITED & ANOR [2009] ACTSC 9 (16 February 2009)
DEFAMATION – newspaper article – imputations of illegal conduct – whether imputations defamatory.
DEFAMATION – newspaper article – defence of truth.
Morgan v Odhams Press Ltd [1971] 1 WLR 1239
John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v ACP Publishing Pty Ltd (2005) 157 ACTR 28
Jones v Skelton [1963] SR (NSW) 644
John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Rivkin (2003) 77 ALJR 1657; 201 ALR 77
David Syme & Co Ltd and Another v Hore-Lacy (2000) 1 VR 667
Favell v Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd (2005) 79 ALJR 1716; (2005) 221 ALR 186
John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Obeid (2005) 64 NSWLR 485
Amalgamated Television Services v Marsden (1998) 43 NSWLR 158
Chakravarti v Advertiser Newspapers Limited (1998) 193 CLR 519
Mirror Newspapers Ltd v Harrison (1982) 149 CLR 293
The Macquarie Dictionary, (3rd ed, 1998)
No. SC 170 of 2005
Judge: Gray J
Supreme Court of the ACT
Date: 16 February 2009
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE )
) No. SC 170 of 2005
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY )
BETWEEN:MACQUARIE BANK LIMITED
(ACN 008 583 542)
First Plaintiff
AND:WARWICK MORRIS
Second Plaintiff
AND:JONATHAN ROURKE
Third Plaintiff
AND:NATIONWIDE NEWS PTY LIMITED (ACN 008 438 828)
First Defendant
AND:NEWS INTERACTIVE PTY LIMITED (ACN 000 529 457)
Second Defendant
ORDER
Judge: Gray J
Date: 16 February 2009
Place: Canberra
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
The plaintiffs’ claim against the first defendant be dismissed with costs.
The plaintiffs have sued the defendants in respect of the publication of certain matters which they claim are defamatory of them. The first plaintiff, Macquarie Bank Limited, conducts business as a provider of investment banking and financial services under the name Macquarie Bank (Macquarie, also sometimes referred to as ‘MBL’). The second plaintiff, Warwick Morris, and the third plaintiff, Jonathan Rourke, were senior executives of Macquarie Bank’s Treasury and Commodities Group. The first defendant, Nationwide News Pty Limited (Nationwide), is the publisher of the Weekend Australian newspaper and published the matter complained of on 5 March 2005. The Weekend Australian is published in the Australian Capital Territory and each other State and Territory of Australia. The second defendant, News Interactive Pty Limited, is the publisher of the Weekend Australian’s content on the Internet.
At the conclusion of the case for the defendants, the plaintiffs and the defendants, by consent, asked that I dismiss the case against the second defendant with no order as to costs. I did so.
The publication
The article of which the plaintiffs complain is headed “The Mine Shaft” and dealt with Macquarie Bank’s involvement in the Beaconsfield Mine, a gold mine near Launceston in Tasmania. It was published on 5 March 2005 in each Australian State and Territory on pages 33 and 43 of that edition. The article deals with an aspect of Macquarie Bank’s involvement in Allstate Exploration (“Allstate” also sometimes referred to as “AXL”) which was…
Continue reading Macquarie Bank Limited v Nationwide News Pty Limited
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Macquarie Bank Limited v Nationwide News Pty Limited [2009] ACTSC 9
- Case
- [2009] ACTSC 9
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the published article contained imputations that were defamatory of Macquarie Bank. The court had to determine if the words used in the article conveyed the necessary defamatory meaning to a reasonable reader and, if they did, whether the defence of truth was available to the defendants. The defence of truth requires that the imputations be proved to be true in every particular. If the defence of truth was available and successful, the defamation claim would fail.
The court found that the article did convey defamatory imputations, including that Macquarie Bank had engaged in illegal conduct, which could lower the bank's reputation in the eyes of right-thinking members of the public. However, the court also found that the defence of truth was available and was successful. The defendants had presented evidence that substantiated the imputations made in the article. As a result, the court dismissed Macquarie Bank's claim with costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The plaintiffs' claim against the first defendant be dismissed with costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.